Graduate College of Drexel University
Critical thinking versus problem solving.
Many people lump critical thinking and problem-solving together into one basket, and while there are similarities, there are also distinct differences. Critical thinking utilizes analysis, reflection, evaluation, interpretation, and inference to synthesize information that is obtained through reading, observing, communicating, or experience to answer the following questions:
- Is this information credible?
- Is the purveyor of the information credible?
- What is the issue?
- How do I feel about this information and how will it inform my decisions?
- Where does this information lead me?
Problem-solving uses many of the same skills, such as observing, analyzing, evaluating, and interpreting, but it takes the process a step further to identify obstacles and then to strategically map out a set of solutions to solve the problem.
So, how can you develop these skills to be a better critical thinker and a better problem solver? You cannot train yourself to be a critical thinker or a problem solver overnight; you should start slow. Work on one sub-skill at a time. Let’s look at each of these sub-skills:
Regardless of position, you can develop analytical skills by analyzing issues, programs, experiences, etc. to break them down into easier to digest chunks to gain a better or deeper understanding. To do this:
- Be more observant
- Ask questions such as who, what, where, when, how, and why
- Learn as much as possible about the given topic
- Map out the topic or issue to gain a visual understanding
- Figure out the difference between fact and opinion
Learning to be reflective is something you can do with nearly every aspect of your professional and personal life. Start a journal and continually ask yourself questions and explore the answers honestly. This experience will open your mind to reflection, which is the process by which you look at your role in a given situation or experience. The best part of journaling – you can go back and re-read and see your progress over time. To begin the process:
- Ask yourself why you did something or reacted in a certain way
- Be open to look at yourself through an honest and critical lens
- Explore your experience through writing
- Ask trusted colleagues for feedback on your findings
We evaluate things all the time without realizing it – products, services, etc. Begin by being aware of this act. Similar to deepening your analysis skills, you can evaluate any issue, topic, program, procedure, policy, etc. through the means listed below to enhance your evaluation skills.
- Compare different issues, topics, programs, etc. – how are they similar, different?
- Look for trends
- Look for conflicts or barriers
- Don’t make assumptions, ask questions to gather information
Interpretation
The act of interpreting something is using a combination of analytical and evaluation skills, but it is a little more difficult to learn on your own. It is best to partner with someone to hone these skills – a trusted colleague or even a mentor, with whom you can put the following into practice.
- Understand your own biases or opinions
- Understand any cultural input, barriers, etc.
- Look at the situation, experience, issue, topic, etc. through different lenses
- Educate yourself about the situation, experience, issue, topic, etc.
- Synthesize the information, data, etc. to develop a deeper understanding
One of the best ways to begin to develop strategic thinking skills is to do some long-range planning. You can start with your own professional goals, think about short-term goals and how those will help you get from point A to point B, and more importantly, how they lay the groundwork for longer-range goals. Keep practicing by employing these tactics.
- Obtain the perspective of others & brainstorm
- Educate yourself about the situation, experience, issue, topic, etc.
- Be forward-thinking in both the short-term and the long-term
- Think about all parties involved and how decisions, etc. will impact them
- Be creative and innovative
We utilize many of these skills each day, even multiple times a day; however, often we do it without realizing it. The first step to enhancing your critical thinking and problem solving skills is to think about them, become aware of them, then you can actively practice to improve them. Critical thinking and problem-solving are two important “soft” or essential skills hiring managers are looking for. According to a Linkedin survey, 57% of business leaders say soft skills are now more important than hard skills. Abby Guthrie, a communications team leader at Findcourses.com argues, “Every soft skill that you develop will be something you will eventually draw on in your career.” These skills are anything but soft, they are essential to your career.
Anne Converse Willkomm Assistant Clinical Professor Department Head of Graduate Studies Goodwin College Drexel University Sources:
Skills You Need
- Career Advices
- Job Search & Interview
- Productivity
- Public Speaking and Presentation
- Social & Interpersonal Skills
Critical Thinking vs Problem Solving: What’s the Difference?
In our blog “Importance of Problem Solving Skills in Leadership ,” we highlighted problem solving skills as a distinct skill set. We outlined a 7-step approach in how the best leaders solve problems.
Critical thinking vs. problem solving
But are critical thinking and problem solving the same? Also, if there are differences, what are they? Although many educators and business leaders lump critical thinking and problem solving together, there are differences:
Problem solving uses many of the same skills required for critical thinking; e.g., observation, analysis, evaluation, interpretation, and reflection. Critical thinking is an important ingredient of problem solving.
Critical thinking vs. problem solving: Not all problems require critical thinking skills
Not every problem-solving skill is a critical thinking skill. That is because not every problem requires thinking. A problem like opening a stubborn pickle jar could simply require brute strength. On the other hand, it becomes a thinking skill when you remember to tap the edge of the pickle jar lid to loosen the seal.
Also, some problem-solving skills are the exact opposite of critical thinking. When you follow directions or use muscle memory or rote (memorization) thinking, there is no critical thinking required. Likewise, skills of persuasion or public oratory are thinking skills, but aren’t necessarily critical thinking skills.
Critical thinking vs. problem solving: The role of emotional intelligence
In our blog “ What is the role of communication in critical thinking ?” we highlighted one author’s argument that critical thinking and problem solving is not always a purely rational process. While critical thinkers are in great demand in the hiring marketplace, employees who are emotionally intelligent bring even greater value to an organization.
Writing for Business News Daily , editor Chad Brooks describes emotional intelligence as “the ability to understand your emotions and recognize the emotions and motivations of those around you.”
So, when looking for star performers, research shows “that emotional intelligence counts for twice as much as IQ and technical skills combined in determining who will be a star performer.”
Further, in today’s collaborative workplace environment, “hiring employees who can understand and control their emotions – while also identifying what makes those around them tick—is of the utmost importance.”
Finally, one expert notes that dealing with emotions is an important part of critical thinking. Emotions can be at the root of a problem. They are frequently symptomatic of problems below the surface. Problem solving when dealing with emotions requires openness to authentic emotional expressions. It requires the understanding that when someone is in pain, it is a problem that is real.
- The Ultimate Guide To Critical Thinking
- Is Critical Thinking A Soft Skill Or Hard Skill?
- How To Improve Critical Thinking Skills At Work And Make Better Decisions
- 5 Creative and Critical Thinking Examples In Workplace
- 25 In-Demand Jobs That Require Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills
- Brainstorming: Techniques Used To Boost Critical Thinking and Creativity
Critical thinking and problem solving: A deeper dive
A recap of the distinct differences between critical thinking and problem solving.
Critical thinking, according to an article on Drexel University’s Graduate College webpage “utilizes analysis, reflection, evaluation, interpretation, and inference to synthesize information that is obtained through reading, observing, communicating, or experience.”
The goal of critical thinking is to evaluate the credibility of both the information and its source. It questions the central issue and how the information will inform intelligent decisions. Finally, it asks the question, “Where does this information lead me?”
Problem solving , as previously mentioned, uses many of those skills, but “it takes the process a step further to identify obstacles and then to strategically map out a set of solutions to solve the problem. That extra step in problem solving is identifying obstacles as well as mapping out a strategic set of solutions to resolve the problem.
How to develop critical thinking skills to become a better problem solver
1. develop your analytical skills..
Pay attention and be more observant. Ask the questions “who, what, where, and why” and learn as much as possible about the topic or problem. Map everything out to imprint or gain a visual understanding and focus on the differences between fact, opinion, and your own bias.
2. Learn the skill of evaluating
As a subset of analysis, you can become skilled in evaluation by:
- comparing similar and related topics, programs, and issues. How are they different, and where are the similarities?
- looking for trends that support (or refute) what you intuitively feel is the solution
- recognizing barriers or conflicts to successful problem resolution
- asking questions and gathering information—assuming nothing, ever.
3. Interpretation with the help of a mentor or someone more experienced
Interpreting a problem accurately employs both analytical and evaluating skills. With practice, you can develop this skill, but to hone your interpretation skills, it is advisable to seek the help of an experienced mentor.
You’ll need to do the following:
- know how your own biases or opinions can be a roadblock to the best decision making
- recognize that cultural differences can be a barrier to communication
- look at the problem from the point of view of others
- learn as much as you can about the problem, topic, or experience
- synthesize everything you have learned in order to make the connections and put the elements of a problem together to form its solution
4. Acquire the skill and habit of reflection.
Being reflective is applicable to almost every aspect of your personal and professional life. To open your mind to reflection, think back to your educational experience. Your instructor may have asked you to keep a reflective journal of your learning-related experiences. A reflective journal requires expressive writing, which, in turn, relieves stress.
Perhaps you have just had a disagreement with a coworker, who became abusive and personal. Not everyone can come up with those instant snappy comebacks on the spot, and it is usually best to disengage before the situation gets worse.
Here’s where reflective journaling helps. When you’re in a calmer state of mind, you can journal the incident to:
- gain deeper insights into your thought processes and actions—How do you feel about not defending yourself from the colleague’s accusations or personal abuse? What was the perfect response that eluded you in the stress of the moment?
- build a different approach to problems—It could be that your co-worker perceives you as unapproachable or unreceptive to suggestions and criticism. Maybe it’s time to have a frank discussion to help you see yourself through the eyes of the coworker.
- get closer to making significant changes in your life—Your journal entries may have displayed a pattern of your behavior on the job, which elicits consistent negative reactions from more than one co-worker.
Your takeaways:
- When evaluating critical thinking vs. problem solving, the elements of both appear to blend into a distinction without a difference.
- Good problem solvers employ the steps of critical thinking, but not all problem solving involves critical thinking.
- Emotional intelligence is an attribute that is a hybrid skill of problem solving and critical thinking.
- You can hone your critical thinking skills to become a better problem solver through application of analysis, evaluation, interpretation, and reflection.
- 10 Best Books On Critical Thinking And Problem Solving
- 12 Common Barriers To Critical Thinking (And How To Overcome Them)
- How To Promote Critical Thinking In The Workplace
Is Critical Thinking Overrated? Disadvantages Of Critical Thinking
- 11 Principles Of Critical Thinking
Further Reading...
5 Creative and Critical Thinking Examples In Workplace
What Is The Role Of Communication In Critical Thinking?
No comments, leave a reply cancel reply.
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Center for Innovation and Analytics
Departments
- Academic Affairs
- Audit and Advisory Services
- Finance and Administration
- Human Resources
- Information Technology
- Office of the President
- Student Affairs
- University Advancement
- University Relations
- Other Offices and Departments
- About the Center for Innovation and Analytics
- Areas of Growth in Analytics
- Analytics Career Preparation
- Microsoft Office Specialist Certifications
- Analytics Courses
- Executives in Residence in Analytics
- Success Stories
- Analytics Events
- SAS Joint Graduate Certificate in Business Analytics
- Analytics Resources
- Online SAS Joint Graduate Certificate in Business Analytics Certificate
- Innovation Courses
- COBE BB&T Innovation Competition
- The Background to Support the Center
- What the Center Provides
- Skills Required by Employers
- Directors' Bios
P.O. Box 6953 Radford, VA 24142 Kyle Hall Suite 231 540.831.5513 cia@radford.edu cia-analytics@radford.edu cia-innovation@radford.edu
Dr. Wil Stanton, Director wstanton@radford.edu cia-analytics@radford.edu
Vicki Perkins, Administrative Assistant vperkins1@radford.edu
Problem Solving, Critical Thinking, and Analytical Reasoning Skills Sought by Employers
In this section:
Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
Analytical Reasoning
View the content on this page in a Word document.
Critical thinking, analytical reasoning, and problem-solving skills are required to perform well on tasks expected by employers. 1 Having good problem-solving and critical thinking skills can make a major difference in a person’s career. 2
Every day, from an entry-level employee to the Chairman of the Board, problems need to be resolved. Whether solving a problem for a client (internal or external), supporting those who are solving problems, or discovering new problems to solve, the challenges faced may be simple/complex or easy/difficult.
A fundamental component of every manager's role is solving problems. So, helping students become a confident problem solver is critical to their success; and confidence comes from possessing an efficient and practiced problem-solving process.
Employers want employees with well-founded skills in these areas, so they ask four questions when assessing a job candidate 3 :
- Evaluation of information: How well does the applicant assess the quality and relevance of information?
- Analysis and Synthesis of information: How well does the applicant analyze and synthesize data and information?
- Drawing conclusions: How well does the applicant form a conclusion from their analysis?
- Acknowledging alternative explanations/viewpoints: How well does the applicant consider other options and acknowledge that their answer is not the only perspective?
When an employer says they want employees who are good at solving complex problems, they are saying they want employees possessing the following skills:
- Analytical Thinking — A person who can use logic and critical thinking to analyze a situation.
- Critical Thinking – A person who makes reasoned judgments that are logical and well thought out.
- Initiative — A person who will step up and take action without being asked. A person who looks for opportunities to make a difference.
- Creativity — A person who is an original thinker and have the ability to go beyond traditional approaches.
- Resourcefulness — A person who will adapt to new/difficult situations and devise ways to overcome obstacles.
- Determination — A person who is persistent and does not give up easily.
- Results-Oriented — A person whose focus is on getting the problem solved.
Two of the major components of problem-solving skills are critical thinking and analytical reasoning. These two skills are at the top of skills required of applicants by employers.
- Return to top of page -
Critical Thinking 4
“Mentions of critical thinking in job postings have doubled since 2009, according to an analysis by career-search site Indeed.com.” 5 Making logical and reasoned judgments that are well thought out is at the core of critical thinking. Using critical thinking an individual will not automatically accept information or conclusions drawn from to be factual, valid, true, applicable or correct. “When students are taught how to use critical thinking to tap into their creativity to solve problems, they are more successful than other students when they enter management-training programs in large corporations.” 6
A strong applicant should question and want to make evidence-based decisions. Employers want employees who say things such as: “Is that a fact or just an opinion? Is this conclusion based on data or gut feel?” and “If you had additional data could there be alternative possibilities?” Employers seek employees who possess the skills and abilities to conceptualize, apply, analyze, synthesize, and evaluate information to reach an answer or conclusion.
Employers require critical thinking in employees because it increases the probability of a positive business outcome. Employers want employees whose thinking is intentional, purposeful, reasoned, and goal directed.
Recruiters say they want applicants with problem-solving and critical thinking skills. They “encourage applicants to prepare stories to illustrate their critical-thinking prowess, detailing, for example, the steps a club president took to improve attendance at weekly meetings.” 7
Employers want students to possess analytical reasoning/thinking skills — meaning they want to hire someone who is good at breaking down problems into smaller parts to find solutions. “The adjective, analytical, and the related verb analyze can both be traced back to the Greek verb, analyein — ‘to break up, to loosen.’ If a student is analytical, you are good at taking a problem or task and breaking it down into smaller elements in order to solve the problem or complete the task.” 9
Analytical reasoning connotes a person's general aptitude to arrive at a logical conclusion or solution to given problems. Just as with critical thinking, analytical thinking critically examines the different parts or details of something to fully understand or explain it. Analytical thinking often requires the person to use “cause and effect, similarities and differences, trends, associations between things, inter-relationships between the parts, the sequence of events, ways to solve complex problems, steps within a process, diagraming what is happening.” 10
Analytical reasoning is the ability to look at information and discern patterns within it. “The pattern could be the structure the author of the information uses to structure an argument, or trends in a large data set. By learning methods of recognizing these patterns, individuals can pull more information out of a text or data set than someone who is not using analytical reasoning to identify deeper patterns.” 11
Employers want employees to have the aptitude to apply analytical reasoning to problems faced by the business. For instance, “a quantitative analyst can break down data into patterns to discern information, such as if a decrease in sales is part of a seasonal pattern of ups and downs or part of a greater downward trend that a business should be worried about. By learning to recognize these patterns in both numbers and written arguments, an individual gains insights into the information that someone who simply takes the information at face value will miss.” 12
Managers with excellent analytical reasoning abilities are considered good at, “evaluating problems, analyzing them from more than one angle and finding a solution that works best in the given circumstances”. 13 Businesses want managers who can apply analytical reasoning skills to meet challenges and keep a business functioning smoothly
A person with good analytical reasoning and pattern recognition skills can see trends in a problem much easier than anyone else.
- Get started with computers
- Learn Microsoft Office
- Apply for a job
- Improve my work skills
- Design nice-looking docs
- Getting Started
- Smartphones & Tablets
- Typing Tutorial
- Online Learning
- Basic Internet Skills
- Online Safety
- Social Media
- Zoom Basics
- Google Docs
- Google Sheets
- Career Planning
- Resume Writing
- Cover Letters
- Job Search and Networking
- Business Communication
- Entrepreneurship 101
- Careers without College
- Job Hunt for Today
- 3D Printing
- Freelancing 101
- Personal Finance
- Sharing Economy
- Decision-Making
- Graphic Design
- Photography
- Image Editing
- Learning WordPress
- Language Learning
- Critical Thinking
- For Educators
- Translations
- Staff Picks
- English expand_more expand_less
Critical Thinking and Decision-Making - What is Critical Thinking?
Critical thinking and decision-making -, what is critical thinking, critical thinking and decision-making what is critical thinking.
Critical Thinking and Decision-Making: What is Critical Thinking?
Lesson 1: what is critical thinking, what is critical thinking.
Critical thinking is a term that gets thrown around a lot. You've probably heard it used often throughout the years whether it was in school, at work, or in everyday conversation. But when you stop to think about it, what exactly is critical thinking and how do you do it ?
Watch the video below to learn more about critical thinking.
Simply put, critical thinking is the act of deliberately analyzing information so that you can make better judgements and decisions . It involves using things like logic, reasoning, and creativity, to draw conclusions and generally understand things better.
This may sound like a pretty broad definition, and that's because critical thinking is a broad skill that can be applied to so many different situations. You can use it to prepare for a job interview, manage your time better, make decisions about purchasing things, and so much more.
The process
As humans, we are constantly thinking . It's something we can't turn off. But not all of it is critical thinking. No one thinks critically 100% of the time... that would be pretty exhausting! Instead, it's an intentional process , something that we consciously use when we're presented with difficult problems or important decisions.
Improving your critical thinking
In order to become a better critical thinker, it's important to ask questions when you're presented with a problem or decision, before jumping to any conclusions. You can start with simple ones like What do I currently know? and How do I know this? These can help to give you a better idea of what you're working with and, in some cases, simplify more complex issues.
Real-world applications
Let's take a look at how we can use critical thinking to evaluate online information . Say a friend of yours posts a news article on social media and you're drawn to its headline. If you were to use your everyday automatic thinking, you might accept it as fact and move on. But if you were thinking critically, you would first analyze the available information and ask some questions :
- What's the source of this article?
- Is the headline potentially misleading?
- What are my friend's general beliefs?
- Do their beliefs inform why they might have shared this?
After analyzing all of this information, you can draw a conclusion about whether or not you think the article is trustworthy.
Critical thinking has a wide range of real-world applications . It can help you to make better decisions, become more hireable, and generally better understand the world around you.
/en/problem-solving-and-decision-making/why-is-it-so-hard-to-make-decisions/content/
We've updated our privacy policy. Click here to review the details. Tap here to review the details.
Activate your 30 day free trial to unlock unlimited reading.
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving
You are reading a preview.
Activate your 30 day free trial to continue reading.
Check these out next
Download to read offline
"We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them." -Albert Einstein Train your brain to look at situations and problems differently, open your mind to new ideas, and use scientific reasoning on your problems.
Recommended
More Related Content
Slideshows for you (20).
Viewers also liked (20)
Similar to Critical Thinking and Problem Solving (20)
More from Michigan Works! Muskegon-Oceana (16)
Recently uploaded (20)
- 1. Sponsored in part by the Workforce Development Agency, State of Michigan, Michigan Works!, through your local Workforce Development Board and Muskegon County Board of Commissioners. Auxiliary aids and services are available upon request to individuals with disabilities EEO/ADA/Employer/Programs -TTY# -711. CRITICAL THINKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING
- 2. In a recent study, CRITICAL THINKING was identified as one of the most important skills needed for job success, and one that is lacking inthe new workforce. “Are They Ready to Work? Employers Perspective on the Basic Knowledge and Applied Skills of New Entrants to the 21stCentury US Workforce” Conducted by The Conference Board, Partnership for 21stCentury Skills, Corporate Voices for Working Families, and Society for Human Resource Management
- 3. “Critical Thinking is reasonable reflectivethinking focused on deciding what to believe or do.” “Critical Thinking is best understood as the ability of thinkers to take charge of their ownthinking.”
- 4. Think of going into the dressing room when you’re shopping. How many times do you twist and twirl in front of the three-sided mirror before deciding whether or not to buy? Critical Thinking is the three-sided mirror of decision making; letting you look at all the angles to make the best possible choice. Another way of looking at it…
- 5. “With workplaces so complex and rapidly changing, combined with the recession, it’s important that newly hired employees have critical thinking skills.” By Pearson’s TalentLensGroup
- 6. Like most skills, critical thinking can be improved! “Critical thinking is harder than people think, because it requires knowledge.” - Joanne Jacobs “Thinking is the hardest work there is, which is probably the reason why so few engage in it.” - Henry Ford
- 7. THE PROCESS OF CRITICAL THINKING Critical Thinking Inform & Describe Discover & Explore Negotiate & Cooperate Test & Revise Integrate & Apply
- 8. Inform & Describe •Clarify •What you need to know •What you already know •Information you have about the issue THE PROCESS OF CRITICAL THINKING
- 9. Discover & Explore •Look at your issue more closely •Start to be more directed and purposeful in seeking information THE PROCESS OF CRITICAL THINKING
- 10. Negotiate & Cooperate •Consider different perspectives •Engage in discussion THE PROCESS OF CRITICAL THINKING
- 11. Test & Revise •Weigh the evidence •Test out different ideas THE PROCESS OF CRITICAL THINKING
- 12. Integrate & Apply •Bring together various ideas •Consolidate and articulate new understandings THE PROCESS OF CRITICAL THINKING
- 13. Improving Your Critical Thinking •Seek out ideas—old and new •Read books, periodicals, articles, etc. •Experiment, brainstorm, have discussions, attend exhibits •Take action •Dare to be different! •Be open minded and flexible •Apply ideas to every facet of your life •Alwaysask, “How can this be done better?”
- 14. •Study innovation, change, and creativity •Be curious and observant •Look at situation through the eyes of a child •Keep asking, “why” •Ask good questions •Constantly reflect on each aspect •Who, what, where, when, why, how, if, etc. Improving Your Critical Thinking
- 15. •Develop your reflective thinking skills •Daydream about the situation •Jump between logical, imaginative, and wild thinking •Build your knowledge and intuition base •Learn how to research and visualize •Use triggers •Find the time and place that help you think best Improving Your Critical Thinking
- 16. •Focus on the most relevant information •Ask the right questions •Separate facts from opinions and assumptions •Make sound decisions •Set priorities •Learn quickly •Apply what they learn to new situations Good Critical Thinkers:
- 17. Problem Solving There is a difference between Critical Thinking and Problem Solving. Critical Thinking is an intentional and reflective way of looking at things or circumstances, while Problem Solving focuses on a specific situation.
- 18. Let’s face it! In the business world, we will always have problems that need to be solved.
- 19. Any question or matter involving doubt, uncertainty, or difficulty. A matter about which it is difficult to decide what to do. But first…what exactly is a problem? Any negative situation, issue, or matter that is unresolved.
- 20. “Problem Solving is a mental process that involves discovering, analyzing, and solving problems to overcome obstacles and find a solution that best resolves the issue.” “Don’t find fault…find aremedy!” -Henry Ford “Problems are only opportunities in work clothes.” -Henri Kaiser
- 21. The Decision Making Process 1 2 3 4 5 6
- 22. The Decision Making Process 1 •Try and figure out exactly what your problem is, and write a problem statement •It helps to think of what you havebut don’t want, or what you want but don’t have 2 •Brainstorm all possible causes of the problem •Attempt to get to the very root cause •Use your inner child; keep asking “why?” 3 •Once you’ve found the cause, think of all possible solutions
- 23. The Decision Making Process •Using your list of possible solutions, evaluate all the possible consequences of each solution •Choose the best solution based on what is most practical •Look at effectiveness •How much risk does the proposed solution carry? •Does it fit within your budget? •Always check back to see how your solution is working, •Revise your plans as needed 4 5 6
- 24. Decision Making Checklist Do I have all the information I need? Have I considered all possible solutions? Will my decision help me meet my goals?
- 25. Does it violate any of my values? Have I considered all the consequences? Can I live with the consequences? Decision Making Checklist
- 26. LEARNING FROM YOUR DECISIONS: Think about: •What went well? •What did not go well? •What could be done differently?
- 27. “You are free to choose, but the choices you make today will determine what you will have, be and do in the tomorrow of your life.” —ZigZiglar
- 28. Final Thoughts •Be objective—think critically •Use your tools •Think both short-term and long-term •Check with others when decisions may affect them •Stay focused •Use your values and goals as a compass
- 29. “Education is not the learning of facts, but the training of the mind to think.” -Albert Einstein
- 30. We hope you found this information helpful. Check us out at www.miworksmo.org. •Give us any questions/comments/concerns •See our workshop schedule •Learn more about Michigan Works! Muskegon-Oceana Like what you saw?
- 31. Sources Cited: Goodwill Industries International, Inc. Critical ThinkingDeveloping Your Decision Making SkillsPublished: December 2009 Critical-Thinkers.comThings That Make You Think: Critical Thinking Quotes By Breanne Harris, Sept. 20, 2010 Mysuperchargedlife.comMaking Positive Choices: Ideas and Thoughts about Forming Good Habits for a Good Life –Jeff, Jan. 22, 2010 About.comWhat is Problem-Solving? By Kendra Cherry Leadershipnow.comLeading Thoughts Quotes on Problem Solving
Share Clipboard
Public clipboards featuring this slide, select another clipboard.
Looks like you’ve clipped this slide to already.
You just clipped your first slide!
Create a clipboard
Get slideshare without ads, special offer to slideshare readers, just for you: free 60-day trial to the world’s largest digital library..
The SlideShare family just got bigger. Enjoy access to millions of ebooks, audiobooks, magazines, and more from Scribd.
You have now unlocked unlimited access to 20M+ documents!
Unlimited Reading
Learn faster and smarter from top experts
Unlimited Downloading
Download to take your learnings offline and on the go
Instant access to millions of ebooks, audiobooks, magazines, podcasts and more.
Read and listen offline with any device.
Free access to premium services like Tuneln, Mubi and more.
Help us keep SlideShare free
It appears that you have an ad-blocker running. By whitelisting SlideShare on your ad-blocker, you are supporting our community of content creators.
We've updated our privacy policy.
We’ve updated our privacy policy so that we are compliant with changing global privacy regulations and to provide you with insight into the limited ways in which we use your data.
You can read the details below. By accepting, you agree to the updated privacy policy.
Compare the Difference Between Similar Terms
Difference Between
Difference Between Creative Thinking and Critical Thinking
August 3, 2011 Posted by Nedha
Creative Thinking vs Critical Thinking
Creative Thinking and Critical Thinking are two expressions that show the difference between them when it comes to their inner meanings. Creative Thinking is going beyond the limitations and being original and fresh in one’s ideas. Critical Thinking, on the other hand, is more evaluative in nature and analyses a particular thing. Hence, one can conclude that while Creative thinking is generative in purpose , Critical Thinking is analytical in purpose. This is one of the main differences between creative thinking and critical thinking. This article attempts to provide an understanding of the two terms while elaborating the difference.
What is Creative Thinking?
First let us pay attention to Creative Thinking. In schools and even in universities the students are asked to be creative in their thoughts . This highlights a need to be original and to think outside of the box. If a person is continuously paying attention to the limitations and boundaries, it is quite difficult to be creative. Creative thinking is non-judgmental and expansive. There is no end to creative thinking. In fact, it can be said that the sky is the limit for creative thinking. This is the specialty of Creative thinking. It allows the person to break away from the usual barriers and imagine the unimaginable. Also, Creative thinking is not selective. The mind is free to think anything creative in the case of creative thinking. Unlike in the case of Critical thinking where you are bound to make some choices , in Creative Thinking it is different. Various kinds of choices are not made in the case of creative thinking. In fact, creative thinking aims at generating new and thought provoking ideas. This is why one can claim that creative thinking is all about imagination and imagery. Hence, it is best suited to creative arts like poetry and painting.
What is Critical Thinking?
Now let us move on to Critical Thinking. Unlike in the case of Creative thinking, Critical thinking adopts a much more rigid position. One of the features of Critical thinking is that it is not so expansive like creative thinking. In fact, it can be said that critical thinking is judgmental in nature. It is interesting to note that critical thinking is selective too. On the other hand, creative thinking is not selective. It is quite free by nature. The mind is free to think anything creative in the case of creative thinking. On the contrary, the mind is limited to think in the case of critical thinking. Creative thinking is employed in areas such as poetry , novel writing, short story writing and fiction writing. On the other hand, critical thinking is employed in organizations , business areas and the like. Critical thinking is aimed at improving the quality of products produced by a company, customer care service, and the like. It analyses the factors governing the process of running a company. One can claim that when being critical, a person is employed in a process of assessing rather than imagining. He would be analytical and break down a particular concept into various parts and analyze them. This includes paying attention to the plus and minus, the pros and cons, when thinking critically. As human beings, we need to have some ability for both creative and critical thinking. Now let us sum up the differences in the following manner.
What is the Difference Between Creative Thinking and Critical Thinking?
• Creative thinking is generative in purpose whereas critical thinking is analytical in purpose. • Critical thinking is selective, but creative thinking is not selective. • The mind is free to wander about in Creative thinking, but in the case of Critical thinking it is not so.
Image Courtesy:
1.”HenryMoore RecliningFigure 1951″. [CC BY-SA 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons
2.Filos Segundo Logo by Filosofias filosoficas [ CC BY-SA 3.0 ], via Wikimedia Commons
Related posts:
About the Author: Nedha
Nedha is a Graduate in Sociology and holds an Advanced Diploma in Psychology. Her research interests are mainly in the fields of Sociology, Applied linguistics, Sociolinguistics, and Linguistic anthropology. She is currently employed as a lecturer
September 4, 2017 at 4:10 pm
The distinctions are very clear.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
- Request Article
Critical thinking vs Creative thinking
Critical Thinking vs Creative Thinking
Critical thinking:.
For inductive arguments, a very similar approach is taken to deductive arguments. First, we begin by examining the validity of the premises. If they are invalid the argument is weak and by extension uncogent. If the premises are valid, the argument is strong and we then examine their truth value. If false then the argument while strong is uncogent, if true however the argument is both strong and cogent.
Creative thinking:
You may also like, master cognitive biases and improve your critical thinking, critical thinking and conflict resolution, critical thinking vs lateral thinking, online learning and critical thinking: how to choose the right course.
Accessibility links
- Skip to content
- Accessibility Help
Critical thinking and problem solving
Using different techniques will identify what information to collect during the problem solving process. Credibility criteria can be used in determining how believable the sources are.
Understanding critical thinking and problem solving
Being able to think critically and problem solve is very important. These are transferable skills which mean they are useful in many different situations such as at school, in the workplace or in day-to-day life experiences.
Critical thinking
Critical thinking involves questioning rather than simply accepting information that you hear or read.
It enables you to identify different points of view, put together arguments, and evaluate the arguments made by others.
Problem solving
Problem solving is about using logic and imagination to make sense of a situation and to come up with an intelligent solution.
Problem solving can be thought of as a process.
quote The measure of success is not whether you have a tough problem to deal with, but whether it is the same problem you had last year. John Foster Dulles, Former US Secretary of State
WBQ Subjects WBQ Subjects up down
- National: Foundation KS4
Using this site without JavaScript may provide unexpected results.
Skip to main content
- Skip to main menu
- Skip to user menu
Problem solving vs decision making – what is the difference?
Written by Changeboard team
Published 30 Jul 2019
30 Jul 2019 • by Changeboard team
The key difference between problem solving and decision making is that solving problems is a process, whereas making decisions is an action based on insights derived during the problem-solving process. Many people use the terms problem solving and decision making interchangeably, but they are not the same.
Problem solving vs decision making
Problem solving is an analytical process used to identify the possible solutions to the situation at hand. Making decisions is a part of problem solving. Problem solving is a complex process, and judgement calls – or decisions – will have to be made on the way.
Decision making is a choice made by using one’s judgement. The art of making sound decisions is a particularly important skill for leaders and managers. You may need to make numerous decisions as part of the problem-solving process. And, of course, leaders and managers will need to use their decision-making skills to determine which solution to pursue. They will also typically need to confirm and set into motion next steps to fix the problem.
Problem solving or decision making – which is most important?
Both problem solving and decision making go hand in hand, but success in one doesn’t automatically lead to the other. Those in leadership and management roles need to understand the difference between the two and aim to make lifelong improvements in both skillsets.
Decisions are made when multiple opportunities for action present themselves. You can make decisions, yet never solve the problem.
You can be adept at problem solving, or finding the root of an issue, and still lack the decision making skills to choose and action viable next steps to bring about a successful outcome.
Quick decisions don’t always lead to best-case solutions. A purist approach to problem solving doesn’t take into account that sometimes a business needs to make the best decision under the existing circumstances (where budget, time and resource constraints might play a factor).
How does problem solving involve decision making?
Decision-making is part of the problem-solving process. A business may have multiple problems that all demand time and resource. A key role in management and leadership positions is deciding which problem to treat as a priority.
Decision making in 3 steps:
- Use problem solving to identify potential solutions – this may involve decision making, such as deciding to hold meetings with stakeholders or assigning team members to tackle particular areas of the problem
- Determine which solution is the best fit for the problem at hand
- Make a decision on next steps to action the chosen solution
The similarities between problem solving and decision making
Problem solving and decision making are not synonymous with each other, but they are both important skills for leaders to have. People often use the terms problem solving and decision making interchangeably specifically because they have elements in common.
Both problem solving and decision making involve critical thinking.
Critical thinking is a process by which you question your own assumptions – as well as those of others - in order to decide on next steps to solve a problem. Critical thinking often results in using a mix of research, analysis, questioning and exploration of new ideas in order to gain rich insight into a situation, becoming informed in a way that isn’t restricted by the subjective perspectives of peers or the status quo.
See our critical thinking tips for HR managers and leaders for a deep dive into critical thinking, or take an eagle’s eye view with our 3 golden tips on how to improve your critical thinking .
How to use decision making in solving problems
It all boils down to one thing: When faced with a challenge, break the problem down into manageable components that require decisions to be made.
The gulf between those embracing change and those falling behind is growing.
Changeboard and Future Talent have been providing insights and learning on how to navigate a way through change since 2004. Now, as we enter an unprecedented period of disruption, we are providing you the opportunity to develop the capabilities, behaviours and mindset necessary to survive and ultimately flourish.
Register for insights and updates or implement one of our levy-funded leadership programmes by clicking on the buttons below.
Register for insights
Discover our Transformational Leadership Programme
By Changeboard team Published: 30 Jul 2019
Articles you might like
Five key principles for leading remote teams to d….
08 Apr 2021 • Frans Campher, Programme Co-Director, Imperial College Business School.
Transformational Tales: leading with social anxie…
01 Apr 2021 • Russell Norris, former Head of Copy, R/GA London
How enforced remote working helped Sharp evolve i…
31 Mar 2021 • Hudson RPO
Understanding and overcoming Zoom fatigue
22 Mar 2021 • Dr Nick Earley, Head of Psychology, Helix Resilience
How our brains hinder creativity
22 Mar 2021 • Adam Kingl, author, keynote speaker and advisor
Loading Results
No Match Found
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving toward Decision-Making
During the training the main critical thinking and problem solving techniques are introduced together with real-life examples. The difference between problem solving and decision making is examined and clarified.
Who is it for?
The course is suitable for business professionals interested in developing their critical thinking and learning how to better solve business problems.
Overview – why the topic is “critical”
- Our changing VUCA world and why adaptability is key ▪ Key outcomes and what this means
- Understanding where companies ‘stand’ and the phase in which they are
- Understanding how companies can grow – directions ▪ Understanding means & methods towards growth ▪ Understanding how to make decisions through SAF ▪ Understanding what areas need to be assessed during SAF
- Understanding what areas need to be assessed during implementation
Difference between Problem Solving & Decision Making
Black box thinking – technique & examples , root cause problem solving – technique and examples , multi – criteria decision making .
- Breaking a company in 2: Outside & Inside ▪ What we control and what we don’t
- A step by step approach (11 main areas) from outside to inside
- How to summarize and use the findings towards Decision Making – Solving the “right problem” by default
Critical Thinking method
- Systematic thinking
- The “Mathematics” in finding solutions
- Examples & activities
Hypothesis based problem solving
- Introduction to problem solving approaches
- Introduction to hypothesis-based problem solving
- Key takeaways
Dr. Constantine “Dino” Kiritsis
International curriculum development expert, entrepreneur, author, award winning training concept developer (hpd) .
Dino is an entrepreneur & consultant in the Business, HR, training & development industry. He is considered a world-class inspirational trainer/presenter having trained and led diverse events for numerous corporations and associations. He has delivered over 15,000 hours of professional training, hosting & presentations in the last 20 years in more than 40 countries in Europe, Asia and the Middle East mainly to corporate clients.
He is also a consultant and International Curriculum Development expert for PwC’s Academy in the CEE and the Middle East. Dino has also done work with PwC’s Global Steering Committee for Private Company Services and has developed the award winning (Silver award, Boussias Education awards 2019) curriculum, methodology and mapping procedure for PwC’s Mini MBA programme being offered in the CEE region & the Middle East in more than 10 countries.
His knowledge areas span from Business Mapping, Business analysis, Entrepreneurship, Strategy and Corporate level training to developing programmes, career management and education, Professional qualifications (PQs) and teaching topics relating to Corporate & Business Strategy, Entrepreneurship, Business Planning, Innovation, Marketing and HR (for specialist qualifications (ACCA, CIA, CIMA, SHRM) and Universities on MBA and DBA programmes.
He has been an active speaker on entrepreneurship, innovation, educational, professional training and business development issues in over 100 events and in the past decade. He holds a Bachelor’s degree from the University of Connecticut (USA), a Masters and a PhD from the University of Surrey (UK), a Diploma in Corporate Governance from the ACCA (Association of Chartered Certified Accountants) is an Associate Member (AICA) of the International Compliance Association and a Senior Certified Professional from the Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM – SMP) USA. He is a member of the board of SoFIA (School of the Future International Academy) in the UK and the President of the SHRM Global Forum for Greece and Cyprus.
For fees, please contact us
Calendar of open seminars
Discover our high level training courses
Registration
Apply for a course
We welcome your comments
Your request / feedback has been routed to the appropriate person. Should you need to reference this in the future we have assigned it the reference number "refID" .
Thank you for your comments / suggestions.
Required fields are marked with an asterisk( * )
Please correct the errors and send your information again.
Tick this box to verify you are not a robot
By submitting your email address, you acknowledge that you have read the Privacy Statement and that you consent to our processing data in accordance with the Privacy Statement (including international transfers). If you change your mind at any time about wishing to receive the information from us, you can send us an email message using the Contact Us page.
Tijana Naumovska
Training Academy Leader, PwC Macedonia
Tel: +38923140900
Fax: +38923116525
Terms and Conditions
© 2017 - 2023 PwC. PwC refers to the PwC network and/or one or more of its member firms, each of which is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.
- About Site Provider
- Cookie info
Information
- Author Services
Initiatives
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
- Active Journals
- Find a Journal
- Proceedings Series
- For Authors
- For Reviewers
- For Editors
- For Librarians
- For Publishers
- For Societies
- For Conference Organizers
- Open Access Policy
- Institutional Open Access Program
- Special Issues Guidelines
- Editorial Process
- Research and Publication Ethics
- Article Processing Charges
- Testimonials
- Preprints.org
- SciProfiles
- Encyclopedia
Article Menu
- Subscribe SciFeed
- Recommended Articles
- Google Scholar
- on Google Scholar
- Table of Contents
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
JSmol Viewer
Conceptualizations of students with and without disabilities as mathematical problem solvers in educational research: a critical review.
1. Introduction
2. conceptual framework.
Disability studies has arisen in the past twenty years to focus an organized critique on the constricted, inadequate, and inaccurate conceptualizations of disability that have dominated academic inquiry. Above all, the critique includes a challenge to the notion that disability is primarily a medical category. Consequently, disability studies contests the current academic division of labor in which the study of the phenomenon rests in the specialized applied fields (rehabilitation, special education, health, and so on) and the rest of the academy is largely exempt from meaningful inquiry into the subject of disability.
2.1. Historical Roots of Mathematics Education
2.2. historical roots of special education, 2.3. research on problem solving, 2.4. neuroscience and education, 4. findings, 4.1. medical theoretical orientation, 4.2. behavioral theoretical orientation, 4.3. informational processing theoretical orientation, 4.4. constructivist theoretical orientation, 4.5. sociocultural theoretical orientation, 4.6. sociopolitical pedagogical orientation, 4.7. word problems and problem posing, 5. discussion, 6. conclusions, acknowledgments, author contributions, conflicts of interest.
- Wei, X.; Lenz, K.B.; Blackorby, J. Math Growth Trajectories of Students with Disabilities: Disability Category, Gender, Racial, and Socioeconomic Status Differences from Ages 7 to 17. Remedial Spec. Educ. 2013 , 34 , 154–165. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Geary, D. Consequences, Characteristics, and Causes of Mathematical Learning Disabilities and Persistent Low Achievement in Mathematics. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 2011 , 32 , 250–263. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- National Governors Association Center for Best Practices; Council of Chief State School Officers. Common Core State Standards for Mathematics ; NGA/CCSSO: Washington, DC, USA, 2010. [ Google Scholar ]
- Kurz, A.; Elliott, S.N.; Wehby, J.H.; Smithson, J.L. Alignment of the Intended, Planned, and Enacted Curriculum in General and Special Education and Its Relation to Student Achievement. J. Spec. Educ. 2010 , 44 , 131–145. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Jackson, H.G.; Neel, R.S. Observing Mathematics: Do Students with EBD Have Access to Standards-Based Mathematics Instruction? Educ. Treat. Child. 2006 , 29 , 593–614. [ Google Scholar ]
- Lambert, R.; Tan, P.A. Comparison of Recent Mathematics Educational Research on Students with and without Disabilities: Persistent “Fault Lines” and Signals of Change. in preparation.
- Lambert, R.; Tan, P. Dis/ability and mathematics: Theorizing the research divide between special education and mathematics. In Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Tucson, Arizona, 3–6 November 2016; Wood, M.B., Turner, E.E., Civil, M., Eli, J.A., Eds.; University of Arizona: Tucson, AZ, USA, 2016; pp. 1057–1063. [ Google Scholar ]
- Union of Physically Impaired Against Segregation. Fundamental Principles of Disability ; Union of Physically Impaired Against Segregation: London, UK, 1975. [ Google Scholar ]
- Connor, D.J.; Valle, J.W.; Hale, C. (Eds.) Practicing Disability Studies in Education: Acting toward Social Change ; Peter Lang: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
- Linton, S. Claiming Disability: Knowledge and Identity ; NYU Press: New York, NY, USA, 1998. [ Google Scholar ]
- Tan, P. Towards equity in mathematics education for students with severe disabilities: A case study of professional learning. Ph.D. Thesis, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA, July 2014. Available online: http://gradworks.umi.com/36/29/3629863.html (accessed on 1 October 2015).
- Gutiérrez, R. The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. J. Res. Math. Educ. 2013 , 44 , 37–68. [ Google Scholar ]
- Powell, A.B.; Brantlinger, A. A pluralistic view of critical mathematics. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference, Proceedings of the Fifth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference, Albufeira, Portugal, 16–21 February 2008; Matos, J.F., Valero, P., Yasukawa, K., Eds.; Centro de Investigação em Educação, Universidade de Lisboa: Lisboa, Portugal; Department of Education, Learning and Philosophy, Aalborg Unviersity: Aalborg, Denmark, 2008; pp. 424–433. [ Google Scholar ]
- Woodward, J. Mathematics Education in the United States Past to Present. J. Learn. Disabil. 2004 , 37 , 16–31. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Thorndike, E.L.; Cobb, M.V.; Orleans, J.S.; Symonds, P.M.; Wald, E.; Woodyard, E. The Psychology of Algebra ; Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 1923. [ Google Scholar ]
- Osgood, R.L. The History of Special Education: A Struggle for Equality in American Public Schools ; Greenwood Publishing Group: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [ Google Scholar ]
- Simon, H.A. Mind as Machine: The Cognitive Revolution in Behavioral Science. In Perspectives in Behavioral Science: The Colorado Lectures ; Jessor, R., Ed.; Westview Press: Boulder, CO, USA, 1991. [ Google Scholar ]
- Proctor, R.W.; Vu, K.L. The Cognitive Revolution at Age 50: Has the Promise of the Human Information-Processing Approach Been Fulfilled? Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2006 , 21 , 253–284. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Newell, A.; Simon, H.A. Human Problem Solving ; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1972. [ Google Scholar ]
- Shalev-Shwartz, S.; Shai, B.D. Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
- Freeman-Green, S.M.; O’Brien, C.; Wood, C.L.; Hitt, S.B. Effects of the SOLVE Strategy on the Mathematical Problem Solving Skills of Secondary Students with Learning Disabilities. Learn. Disabil. Res. Pract. 2015 , 30 , 76–90. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Thompson, P.W. Constructivism in Mathematics Education. In Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education ; Lerman, S., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 96–102. [ Google Scholar ]
- Confrey, J.; Kazak, S. A Thirty-Year Reflection on Constructivism in Mathematics Education in PME. In Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Past, Present and Future ; Gutierrez, A., Ed.; Sense Publishers: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; pp. 305–345. [ Google Scholar ]
- Polya, G. How to Solve It: A New Mathematical Method ; Doubleday: New York, NY, USA, 1957. [ Google Scholar ]
- Schoenfeld, A.H. Mathematical Problem-Solving ; Elsevier: Chicago, IL, USA, 1988. [ Google Scholar ]
- Confrey, J. A Review of the Research on Student Conceptions in Mathematics, Science, and Programming. Rev. Res. Educ. 1990 , 16 , 3–56. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Piaget, J. Language and Thought from a Genetic Perspective. Acta Psychol. 1954 , 10 , 51–60. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Lerman, S. The Social Turn in Mathematics Education Research. In Multiple Perspectives on Mathematics Teaching and Learning ; Boaler, J., Ed.; Ablex Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2000; pp. 19–44. [ Google Scholar ]
- Nasir, N.S. Identity, Goals, and Learning: Mathematics in Cultural Practice. Math. Think. Learn. 2002 , 4 , 213–247. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Boaler, J. The Development of Disciplinary Relationships: Knowledge, Practice and Identity in Mathematics Classrooms. Learn. Math. 2002 , 22 , 42–47. [ Google Scholar ]
- Pea, R.D. Practices of Distributed Intelligence and Designs for Education. In Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations ; Salomon, G., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1993. [ Google Scholar ]
- Wenger, E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1999. [ Google Scholar ]
- Boaler, J.; Greeno, J.G. Identity, Agency, and Knowing in Mathematics Worlds. In Multiple Perspectives on Mathematics Teaching and Learning ; Boaler, J., Ed.; Ablex Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2000; pp. 171–200. [ Google Scholar ]
- Valero, P. Socio-Political Perspectives on Mathematics Education. In Researching the Socio-Political Dimensions of Mathematics Education ; Jorgensen, R., Valero, P., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 5–23. [ Google Scholar ]
- Goldin, G.A. Representation in Mathematical Learning and Problem Solving. In Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education ; Taylor and Francis: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 197–218. [ Google Scholar ]
- Swanson, H.L. Information Processing Theory and Learning Disabilities: An Overview. J. Learn. Disabil. 1987 , 20 , 3–7. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Goldman, S.R. Strategy Instruction in Mathematics. Learn. Disabil. Q. 1989 , 12 , 43–55. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Jitendra, A.K.; Danielle, N.D.; Rodriguez, M.C.; Zaslofsky, A.F.; Slater, S.; Kelly, C.; Church, C. A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Impact of Schema-Based Instruction on Mathematical Outcomes for Third-Grade Students with Mathematics Difficulties. Elem. Sch. J. 2013 , 114 , 252–276. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Van Garderen, D.; Scheuermann, A.; Jackson, C.; Hampton, D. Supporting the Collaboration of Special Educators and General Educators to Teach Students Who Struggle with Mathematics: An Overview of the Research. Psychol. Sch. 2009 , 46 , 56–78. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Schoenfeld, A.H. Explorations of Students’ Mathematical Beliefs and Behavior. J. Res. Math. Educ. 1989 , 20 , 338–355. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Schoenfeld, A.H. Reflections on Problem Solving Theory and Practice. Math. Enthus. 2013 , 10 , 9–34. [ Google Scholar ]
- Schoenfeld, A.H. What’s all the fuss about problem solving. Zentral. Didakt. Math. 1991 , 91 , 4–8. [ Google Scholar ]
- Samuels, B.M. Can the differences between education and neuroscience be overcome by mind, brain, and education? Mind Brain Educ. 2009 , 3 , 45–55. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Ansari, D.; Coch, D.; De Smedt, B. Connecting Education and Cognitive Neuroscience: Where will the journey take us? Educ. Philos. Theory 2009 , 43 , 37–42. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Gabrieli, J.D.E. Dyslexia: A New Synergy between Education and Cognitive Neuroscience. Science 2009 , 325 , 280–283. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- De Smedt, B.; Ansari, D.; Grabner, R.H.; Hannula-Sormunen, M.; Schneider, M.; Verschaffel, L. Cognitive neuroscience meets mathematics education: It takes two to Tango. Educ. Res. Rev. 2011 , 6 , 232–237. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Verschaffel, L.; Lehtinen, E.; Dooren, W.V. Neuroscientific studies of mathematical thinking and learning: A critical look from a mathematics education viewpoint. ZDM 2016 , 48 , 385–391. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Lubienski, S.T.; Bowen, A. Who’s Counting? A Survey of Mathematics Education Research 1982–1998. J. Res. Math. Educ. 2000 , 31 , 626–633. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Swanson, H.L.; Lussier, C.M.; Orosco, M.J. Cognitive Strategies, Working Memory, and Growth in Word Problem Solving in Children with Math Difficulties. J. Learn. Disabil. 2015 , 48 , 339–358. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Vukovic, R.K.; Lesaux, N.K. The Relationship between Linguistic Skills and Arithmetic Knowledge. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2013 , 23 , 87–91. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Bae, Y.S.; Chiang, H.; Hickson, L. Mathematical Word Problem Solving Ability of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Their Typically Developing Peers. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2015 , 45 , 2200–2208. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Carpenter, T.P.; Fennema, E.; Franke, M.L.; Levi, L.; Empson, S.B.; Lindquist, M.M. Children’s Mathematics: Cognitively Guided Instruction , 2nd ed.; Heinemann Press: Portsmouth, NH, USA, 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
- Bonotto, C. Artifacts as Sources for Problem-Posing Activities. Educ. Stud. Math. 2013 , 83 , 37–55. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Hunt, J.H.; Vasquez, E. Effects of Ratio Strategies Intervention on Knowledge of Ratio Equivalence for Students with Learning Disability. J. Spec. Educ. 2014 , 48 , 180–190. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Hunt, J.; Empson, S. Exploratory Study of Informal Strategies for Equal Sharing Problems of Students with Learning Disabilities. Learn. Disabil. Q. 2014 , 38 , 208–220. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Powell, S.R.; Driver, M.K.; Julian, T.E. The Effect of Tutoring with Nonstandard Equations for Students with Mathematics Difficulty. J. Learn. Disabil. 2015 , 48 , 523–534. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Carpenter, T.P.; Franke, M.L.; Levi, L. Thinking Mathematically: Integrating Arithmetic and Algebra in Elementary School ; Heinemann Press: Portsmouth, NH, USA, 2003. [ Google Scholar ]
- Nasir, N.S.; Hand, V.M. Exploring Sociocultural Perspectives on Race, Culture, and Learning. Rev. Educ. Res. 2006 , 76 , 449–475. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Francisco, J.M. Learning in Collaborative Settings: Students Building on Each Other’s Ideas to Promote Their Mathematical Understanding. Educ. Stud. Math. 2013 , 82 , 417–438. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Verzosa, D.B.; Mulligan, J. Learning to Solve Addition and Subtraction Word Problems in English as an Imported Language. Educ. Stud. Math. 2013 , 82 , 223–244. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Birky, G.D.; Chazan, D.; Morris, K.F. In Search of Coherence and Meaning: Madison Morgan’s Experiences and Motivations as an African American Learner and Teacher. Teach. Coll. Rec. 2013 , 115 , 1–42. [ Google Scholar ]
- Van Harpen, X.Y.; Presmeg, N.C. An Investigation of Relationships between Students’ Mathematical Problem-Posing Abilities and Their Mathematical Content Knowledge. Educ. Stud. Math. 2013 , 83 , 117–132. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Ticha, M.; Hospesova, A. Developing Teachers’ Subject Didactic Competence through Problem Posing. Educ. Stud. Math. 2013 , 83 , 133–143. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Lewis, K.E. Difference Not Deficit: Reconceptualizing Mathematical Learning Disabilities. J. Res. Math. Educ. 2014 , 45 , 351–396. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. The Co-Construction of Learning Difficulties in Mathematics; Teacher–student Interactions and Their Role in the Development of a Disabled Mathematical Identity. Educ. Stud. Math. 2013 , 83 , 341–368. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Lambert, R. Constructing and Resisting Disability in Mathematics Classrooms: A Case Study Exploring the Impact of Different Pedagogies. Educ. Stud. Math. 2015 , 89 , 1–18. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Múñez, D.; Orrantia, J.; Rosales, J. The Effect of External Representations on Compare Word Problems: Supporting Mental Model Construction. J. Exp. Educ. 2013 , 81 , 337–355. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Siebers, T. Disability Theory ; University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2008. [ Google Scholar ]
- Annamma, S.A.; Connor, D.; Ferri, B. Dis/ability Critical Race Studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the Intersections of Race and Dis/ability. Race Ethn. Educ. 2013 , 16 , 1–31. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- De Freitas, E.; Sinclair, N. Mathematics and the Body: Material Entanglements in the Classroom ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
Share and Cite
Lambert, R.; Tan, P. Conceptualizations of Students with and without Disabilities as Mathematical Problem Solvers in Educational Research: A Critical Review. Educ. Sci. 2017 , 7 , 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7020051
Lambert R, Tan P. Conceptualizations of Students with and without Disabilities as Mathematical Problem Solvers in Educational Research: A Critical Review. Education Sciences . 2017; 7(2):51. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7020051
Lambert, Rachel, and Paulo Tan. 2017. "Conceptualizations of Students with and without Disabilities as Mathematical Problem Solvers in Educational Research: A Critical Review" Education Sciences 7, no. 2: 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7020051
Article Metrics
Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
Creative thinking, critical thinking and problem-solving: what’s the difference?
Creative thinking, critical thinking, and problem-solving: what’s the difference.
All the terms above – critical thinking, problem-solving and creative thinking – are often used interchangeably. This can be confusing when you’re trying to figure out what skills you need to develop, or to apply to get the job done.
In reality, all three of these cognitive processes play an important role in how we make decisions and solve problems in our everyday lives and in business, but each operates differently.
If you want to learn more about critical thinking vs. problem-solving vs. creative thinking, read on!
The World Economic Forum Future of Jobs Report
In the World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2020, all of the above terms feature in the top 10, as key skills expected to be vital in the world of work by 2025.
- Analytical thinking and innovation
- Active learning and learning strategies
- Complex problem solving
- Critical thinking and analysis
- Creativity, originality and initiative
“Core skills such as critical thinking, analysis and problem solving are consistently top of the reskilling and upskilling priorities for educators and businesses,” the report says.
The WEF report suggests that those with strong creative skills will be able to solve problems that are too complex for more traditional approaches. They’ll also be better equipped to deal with uncertainty and ambiguity in a constantly changing environment. This kind of thinking is not likely to be replaced by AI in the near future, unlike some other roles.
This is because creativity and innovation require us to think differently about our usual approach to solving problems, which sometimes means going against the status quo or trying something new.
The process of developing creative ideas to solve problems is called problem solving. Problem solving often requires more than just creativity; it also requires critical thinking. Critical thinkers evaluate solutions to problems, in order to make decisions that are most likely to succeed.
Creative thinkers generate new ideas for solving problems and have no preconceived notions about what will work or not work. They focus on generating as many different types of possible solutions as possible, while critical thinkers will consider all available information before deciding which option might be best.
Definitions
What is problem-solving?
Problem solving can be defined as: “ the act of defining a problem; determining the cause of the problem; identifying, prioritizing, and selecting alternatives for a solution; and implementing a solution.”
Example problem: The world’s coral reefs are under threat from global warming, pollution and over-fishing.
Possible solutions to solve the problem:
- Don’t buy exotic fish
- Recycle and dispose of rubbish properly
- Minimize use of lawn fertilizers
Of course, these solutions vary in complexity and difficulty and would need a combination of ways of thinking to decide what to do.
What is the definition of creative thinking?
Creative thinking is when you have an idea that is new or original. It can be solving a problem or coming up with a new way to do something.
We like Sir Ken Robinson’s definition of creativity as:
“the process of having original ideas that have value”.
Creativity is closely aligned with careers like PR, marketing and advertising as there is often not a ‘problem’ to be solved, but there is a need to do something in a new way – like encourage footfall and sales at Christmas if you’re a retailer, or if you want to sell more cat food.
Problem: The world’s coral reefs are under threat from global warming, pollution and over-fishing.
A proposed creative solution that tries to solve the problem and is a creative way of selling more cat food:
“Cats love fish and it’s important to provide our cherished friends with the high-quality food they crave, but that should never come at the expense of the planet. By regenerating our reefs today, we can help to ensure a more plentiful, sustainable fish population for generations to come. Of course, it’ll keep cats happy, but it’s also vital for the nearly 500 million people globally who rely on reefs for food, income and coastal protection. Because more coral today means more fish tomorrow.”
The Sheba Hope Grows campaign .
What’s the difference between creative thinking and problem solving?
Creative thinking is when you think of new ways to do something or solve a particular problem. Problem solving is when you are trying to find a solution for a certain specific problem.
What is critical thinking?
Critical thinking is a process of examining both your own and other’s thoughts and identifying which ones are based on logic and reason. Critical thinkers are able to analyse arguments objectively by looking at different aspects of an issue or topic. They can also understand the limits of their knowledge and expertise, as well as consider ideas from other perspectives.
Critical thinking is when you use your knowledge in a systematic way to solve problems or make decisions.
This kind of thinking involves questioning, analysis, interpretation, evaluation and judgement about what you read, hear, say, or write.
It comes from the Greek word kritikos meaning “able to judge or discern”.
Applying critical thinking to the reef problem above:
Critical thinking and analysis would have been needed to consider the options in order to decide what idea to pursue that helped to solve the reef problem, and sell more catfood for Sheba.
Factors under consideration from the media agency’s website:
“Working with Mars Petcare and our agency colleagues, including those at AMV BBDO, Google & Freuds, we spread a message of hope. We would show the world that coral reefs can be restored and that it’s possible to reverse the trend of environmental degradation with passion and endeavour.
On an atoll destroyed by bombing off the coast of Sulawesi in Indonesia we built Hope Reef. When viewed from the air it spelled out the word HOPE at such scale it was captured by satellites and incorporated into Google Earth, Maps and StreetView.
Sheba set out to have a positive impact on the future of fish, to increase brand salience, and grow sales.
The reef is thriving, with 70% coral coverage, +300% fish abundance, +175% average fish size and +10% more species. Over 1 million people have explored Hope Reef on Google Maps and Sheba’s “Reef Star” System has been adopted by 5 more countries, with 40,000 sqm of reef regrown so far. With 20 million views, our YouTube ‘Channel That Grows Coral’ has raised enough funds for a new crowdfunded reef.
Our high-impact paid media campaign across 11 markets to date has helped to grow brand awareness by +17% and purchase intent by +14%.”
Source: https://www.mediacom.com/en/case-studies/sheba-hope-reef
Of course, in business and elsewhere, we need ideas that are both novel and useful so we need to be able to flex between these different ways of thinking.
Scientists have found that creativity blends spontaneous and controlled thinking. This is the ability to
“ both spontaneously brainstorm ideas and deliberately evaluate them to determine whether they’ll actually work,” says American neuroscientist Roger Beaty.
Our strategy and creative thinking training courses here at Now Go Create help individuals and businesses with their creative thinking, critical thinking and problem-solving – please contact [email protected] if you’d like to find out more.
You might like these blogs too:
More on our critical thinking and devising creative strategy courses
More on problem-solving and how the CIA solves problems
More on what we’ve learned from about creative thinking and generating ideas
How to craft a business strategy with a story
Creative thinking, critical thinking, and problem-solving: what’s the difference? All the terms above – critical thinking, problem-solving and creative thinking – are often used interchangeably. This can be confusing when you’re trying to figure out what skills you need to develop, or to apply to get the job done. In reality, all three of these […]
10 CONSUMER TRENDS FOR 2023 – EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW
6 Free Stellar Creative Thinking Tools You'll Want to Swipe
Contact us now and get our.
Free Creativity Hacks
Get in touch to have a creative consultation with us to up the ante on your creativity today!
- 21 free creative strategies worth £10
- Devised by author and Now Go Create Founder Claire Bridges
- Conquer the blank page & improve your brainstorms
Privacy Policy
Win 4 places worth £500 on our most popular workshop!
- Contact Sales
- Leadership |
- Convergent vs. divergent thinking: Find ...
Convergent vs. divergent thinking: Finding the right balance for creative problem solving
Convergent thinking focuses on finding one well-defined solution to a problem. Divergent thinking is the opposite of convergent thinking and involves more creativity. In this piece, we’ll explain the differences between convergent and divergent thinking in the problem-solving process. We’ll also discuss the importance of using both types of thinking to improve your decision making.
Have you ever taken a personality test like the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator? If so, you’ve likely answered a bunch of questions for an algorithm to tell you how you interact with the world around you. One thing this test will tell you is if you make decisions more objectively (thinkers) or decisions more subjectively (feelers).
What is the difference between convergent and divergent thinking?
J. P. Guilford, a psychologist, created the terms convergent and divergent thinking in 1956. Convergent thinking focuses on reaching one well-defined solution to a problem. This type of thinking is best suited for tasks that involve logic as opposed to creativity, such as answering multiple-choice tests or solving a problem where you know there are no other possible solutions.
Divergent thinking is the opposite of convergent thinking and involves more creativity. With this type of thinking, you can generate ideas and develop multiple solutions to a problem. While divergent thinking often involves brainstorming for many possible answers to a question, the goal is the same as convergent thinking—to arrive at the best solution.
In practice, here’s what these different types of thinking might look like:
Convergent thinking: If the copy machine breaks at work, a convergent thinker would call a technician right away to fix the copy machine.
Divergent thinking: If the copy machine breaks at work, a divergent thinker would try to determine the cause of the copy machine’s malfunction and assess various ways to fix the problem. One option may be to call a technician, while other options may include looking up a DIY video on YouTube or sending a company-wide email to see if any team members have experience with fixing copy machines. They would then determine which solution is most suitable.
Convergent thinking in project management
You may use convergent thinking in project management without being aware of it. Because convergent thinking embraces structure and clear solutions, it’s natural for project managers to lean toward this approach. The benefits of convergent thinking include:
A quicker way to arrive at a solution
Leaves no room for ambiguity
Encourages organization and linear processes
There’s nothing wrong with using convergent thinking to align teams, create workflows, and plan projects. There are many instances in project management when you must reach solutions quickly. However, if you completely avoid divergent thinking, you’ll have trouble developing innovative solutions to problems.
The benefits of divergent thinking
It can be difficult as a busy project manager to slow down and think divergently. Projects have deadlines and it’s important to make decisions quickly. You may think that if you don’t come up with a solution right away, you’ll disappoint your clients or customers.
However, working too quickly can also cause you to make decisions within your comfort zone instead of taking risks. Divergent thinking can benefit you as a project manager because you’ll adopt a learning mindset. Divergent thinking can also help you:
Identify new opportunities
Find creative ways to solve problems
Assess ideas from multiple perspectives
Understand and learn from others
Fast results and predictability may work some of the time, but this way of thinking won’t help you stand out from competitors. You’ll need divergent thinking to impress clients or customers and set yourself apart from others.
Use convergent and divergent thinking for creative problem solving
You can use a mix of convergent and divergent thinking to solve problems in your processes or projects. Without using both types of thinking, you’ll have a harder time getting from point A to point B.
1. Discover: Divergent thinking
The first stage of creative problem solving is discovery, and in this stage, you’ll need to use divergent thinking. When you have a problem at work, the first step is to discover the cause of the problem by considering all of the possibilities.
For example, you may have had multiple projects run over budget. This begs the question: Why does this keep happening? If you used convergent thinking to answer this question, you might jump straight to a conclusion about why these budget overruns are happening. But when you use divergent thinking, you consider all possible causes of the problem.
Possible causes of budget overruns may include:
Lack of communication between team members
Improper allocation of resources
Poor project planning
Projects taking longer than expected
Now that you have all the possible causes of your problem, you can move on to the next stage of creative problem solving, which is to define your cause.
2. Define: Convergent thinking
Use convergent thinking when narrowing down the potential causes of your problem. While it’s possible that more than one cause led to your budget overruns, convergent thinking requires a focused approach to solving your problem, so you’ll need to choose the cause you think is most problematic.
Lack of communication may have contributed to your budget overruns, but if poor project planning played a bigger role in your budget woes, then it’s the cause you should go with. When you create a solution to your project planning procedure, it can result in better budgeting. Most causes are also inter-linked. So better planning will improve workplace communication even if it wasn't the primary goal.
3. Deduce: Divergent thinking
In stage three, you’ll switch back to divergent thinking as you work to find a solution for your problem. If the cause of your budget overruns is poor project planning, then possible solutions may include:
Use a project plan template
Better communication with stakeholders
More thorough research of project requirements
Implement cost control methods
You must consider all possible solutions to your problem before you can land on the best solution.
4. Determine: Convergent thinking
The last stage of problem solving is when you’ll use convergent thinking once again to determine which solution will most effectively eliminate your problem. While all the solutions you came up with in stage three may solve your problem to some degree, you should begin with one action item to address. In some instances, you may focus on more than one action item, but only do so if these items are related.
For example, after discussing the possible solutions with your team, you decide that adding cost control methods to your cost management plan should prevent budget overruns and may even help you save money.
How to be a more divergent thinker
Becoming a more divergent thinker will help you exercise both sides of your brain and ensure you see problems from every angle. The following strategies can stimulate divergent thinking:
1. Think about your thinking process
Sometimes the best strategy is the simplest one. When you’re mindful about thinking divergently, it becomes easier to do. Try putting notes up in your office or adding steps in your processes that encourage divergent thinking.
Steps that encourage divergent thinking may include:
Require at least a one-hour break before sending emails regarding big decisions
Before making a big decision, put yourself in the shoes of other team members and consider their perspectives
Don’t make big decisions without vetting your decision with at least two people
By taking active steps to think about your thinking, you may realize that divergent thinking comes more naturally.
2. Try brainstorming and mind mapping
Brainstorming and mind mapping are two strategies that inspire divergent thinking because they help you think outside the box and generate new ideas. Mind mapping is a form of brainstorming in which you diagram tasks, words, concepts, or items that link to a central concept. This diagram helps you visualize your thoughts and generate ideas without worrying about structure.
You can also brainstorm in other ways. Other divergent thinking brainstorming techniques include:
Starbursting: Starbursting is a visual brainstorming technique where you put an idea on the middle of a whiteboard and draw a six-point star around it. Each point will represent the questions: who, what, when, where, why, and how?
SWOT analysis: SWOT analysis can be used for strategic planning and brainstorming. You can use it to vet the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of an idea.
Lightning decision jam: Known as LDJ for short, this brainstorming technique begins with writing down positives about a topic or what’s working regarding the topic, then writing down negatives and identifying what needs to be addressed most urgently.
Try group brainstorming sessions to get fresh ideas and solutions. If you perform these sessions regularly, you may find them enjoyable and crucial for creative problem solving.
3. Free yourself from time constraints
Everyone has deadlines they must meet. But if you’re making an important decision or trying to solve a crucial problem, try to get rid of those strict time constraints so you don’t feel pressured to skip straight to a convergent thinking approach.
Some techniques you can use to relieve pressure caused by deadlines include:
Request a meeting agenda in advance so you have time to prepare.
Use timeboxing to come up with multiple ideas in 5-10 minute intervals.
Set personal deadlines before official deadlines to give yourself some wiggle room.
It’s understandable to feel rushed to find the correct answer in a high-pressure work environment, but you won’t know that your answer is the correct one without taking the time to consider all possible solutions.
4. Use work management software
Work management is an approach to organizing projects, processes, and routine tasks in order to provide clarity to your team so they can hit their goals faster. Work management software, like Asana, can benefit both types of thinking.
If you’re having trouble with divergent thinking in particular, there are certain features of the software you may find most useful. Work management software can stimulate divergent thinking by allowing you to:
Collaborate with others on projects
Share ideas and feedback quickly
Make changes at the click of a button
Keeping your projects online is also important because your team can work together regardless of whether they work remotely or in the office.
5. Get curious and take risks
Sometimes team members settle into convergent thinking habits because they’re afraid of taking risks. While it’s important to prevent project risks when possible, you shouldn’t be afraid to steer away from traditional processes and think outside of the box.
The best project managers can switch between convergent and divergent thinking depending on whether a situation requires a quick and structured solution or an open mind. Not every situation requires subjectivity, but you’ll often need to use a mix of convergent and divergent thinking to be a successful leader.
Develop creative ideas with convergent and divergent thinking
We all have a natural cognitive approach to creative problem solving, and there’s nothing wrong with sticking to your guns. But if you want to inspire idea generation and solve problems in the best way possible, then you must use both convergent and divergent thinking.
Related resources
How decision-making processes can help businesses stay agile
How to think more like a futurist
Exit interview: 7 questions to gain valuable insights (with template)
The ladder of inference: How to make better decisions
Chapter 1: Decision making, problem solving, critical thinking, and clinical reasoning
Terms in this set (63)
Students also viewed, chapter 2: study questions - humanology, ch 2 classical views of leadership and manage…, leadership roles and management functions in…, chapter 1: thinking, sets found in the same folder, marquis leadership 8e ch 1: decision making,…, delegation nurs 412, marquis leadership 8e ch 12 organizational st…, nurs 412 exam 2: problem solving/decision mak….
Other sets by this creator
Als/bls study guide, lecture 10- cardiovascular/ respiratory funct…, falls, safety, rest, and sleep, chapter 16: socializing, educating staff for…, verified questions.
Use set notation to write the elements of each set. than determine whether the statement about the set is time or false. K is th e set of con so nant let te rs in the Englis alphabet. h ∈ K h \in K h ∈ K
In this exercise, perform the indicated multiplications.
( 2 a + 3 b + 1 ) ( 2 a + 3 b − 1 ) (2 a+3 b+1)(2 a+3 b-1) ( 2 a + 3 b + 1 ) ( 2 a + 3 b − 1 )
Use a unit circle diagram to find: a. cos ( 3 π 2 ) and sin ( 3 π 2 ) \cos \left(\frac{3 \pi}{2}\right) \quad \text { and } \quad \sin \left(\frac{3 \pi}{2}\right) cos ( 2 3 π ) and sin ( 2 3 π ) b. cos ( − π 2 ) and sin ( − π 2 ) \cos \left(-\frac{\pi}{2}\right) \quad \text { and } \quad \sin \left(-\frac{\pi}{2}\right) cos ( − 2 π ) and sin ( − 2 π )
Draw the region in the plane that satisfies both inequalities.
3 x − y ≤ 6 3 x-y \leq 6 3 x − y ≤ 6
x − y ≥ − 1 x-y \geq-1 x − y ≥ − 1
Recommended textbook solutions
Elementary Number Theory
Book of Proof
Numerical Analysis
How to Prove It: A Structured Approach
Other quizlet sets, phsc 121 hw 1.
chm2045 final
The Peak Performance Center
The pursuit of performance excellence, analytical thinking and critical thinking.
Some people assume that analytical thinking and critical thinking are one in the same. However, that is incorrect. Although there are similarities, there are distinct differences between the two.
Definitions:
Analytical thinking is the mental process of breaking down complex information or comprehensive data into fundamental parts or basic principles.
Critical thinking is the mental process of carefully evaluating information and determining how to interpret it in order to make a sound judgment.
Differences between Analytical Thinking and Critical Thinking
A basic difference between analytical thinking and critical thinking is analytical thinking involves breaking down complex information into smaller parts while critical thinking involves taking outside knowledge into account while evaluating information. Basically, analytical thinking seeks to review and breakdown the information gathered while critical thinking looks to make a holistic judgment using various sources of information including a person’s own existing knowledge.
Analytical thinking is more linear and step-by-step breakdown of information. On the other hand, critical thinking is more holistic as it seeks to assess, question, verify, infer, interpret, and formulate.
Analytical thinking can be thought of as a step in the critical thinking process. When you have a complex problem to solve, you would want to use your analytical skills before your critical thinking skills. Critical thinking does involve breaking down information into parts and analyzing the parts in a logical, step-by-step manner. However, it also involves taking other information to make a judgment or formulate innovative solutions.
Additionally, with analytical thinking, you use facts within the information gathered to support your conclusion. Conversely, with critical thinking, you make a judgment based on your opinion formed by evaluating various sources of information including your own knowledge and experiences.
About Analytical Thinking
Analytical thinking uses a step-by-step method to analyze a problem or situation by breaking it down into smaller parts in order to come to a conclusion.
With analytical thinking, you make conclusions by breaking down complex information into smaller parts and analyzing the parts. You look for patterns and trends as well a cause and effect within the information in order to find connections between the parts. In the end, you make draw a conclusion based on the available facts.
Steps for Analytical Thinking
Analytical thinking begins by gathering all relevant information. You then break up large, complex data into smaller, more manageable sizes. You then examine each sub-part to understand its components and relationship to the larger more complex data. You compare sets of data from different sources by looking at the information through different points of view with the objective to understand how it connects to other information. You search for patterns, trends, and cause and effect. Finally, you draw appropriate conclusions from the information in order to arrive at appropriate solutions.
Analytical thinking involves:
- Gathering relevant information
- Focusing on facts and evidence
- Examining chunks of data or information
- Identifying key issues
- Using logic and reasoning to process information
- Separating more complex information into simpler parts
- Sub-dividing information into manageable sizes
- Finding patterns and recognizing trends
- Identify cause and effect
- Understanding connections and relationships
- Eliminating extraneous information
- Organizing Information
- Drawing appropriate conclusions
About Critical Thinking
Critical thinking employs logic and reasoning to come to a conclusion about how best to perceive and interpret information in order to make sound judgments.
With critical thinking, you make conclusions regarding your unique perception of the information. You look into other pieces of data that could be relevant. Then you combine your new information with your existing knowledge of the world in order to make the most accurate assessment. Essentially, you reflect upon information in order to form a sound judgment that reconciles scientific evidence with common sense. Ultimately, you make reasoned judgments that are logical and well thought out by assessing the evidence that supports a specific theory or conclusion.
Steps for Critical Thinking
Critical thinking involves gathering all relevant information, then evaluating the information to determine how it should be best interpreted. You evaluate information by asking questions, assessing value, and making inferences. You then formulate ideas and theories based on the evaluation. You consider outside information rather than sticking strictly with the information presented. You then consider alternative possibilities before reaching a well-reasoned conclusion. Finally, you test your conclusions in an attempt to verify if evidence supports your conclusions and make your judgment.
Critical thinking involves:
- Evaluating information
- Asking questions
- Assessing bias or unsubstantiated assumptions
- Making inferences from the information and filling in gaps
- Using abstract ideas to interpret information
- Formulating ideas
- Weighing opinions
- Reaching well-reasoned conclusions
- Considering alternative possibilities
- Testing conclusions
- Verifying if evidence/argument support the conclusions
Copyright © 2023 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes
Instant Assignment Help on All Subjects - Get Upto 50% Off Order Now
Difference between Critical Thinking, Clinical Reasoning, and Clinical Judgment
March 08, 2023
The Ultimate Essay, and Interesting Topics yours with Examples
No 1 Assignment Help is only a click away.
Get assignments quote instantly.
- Australia(+61)
- United states america(+1)
- United kingdom(+44)
- Russian Federation(+7)
- Germany(+49)
- Hong kong(+8)
- Ireland(+353)
- Jordan(+962)
- Kenya(+254)
- Malaysia(+60)
- New zealand(+64)
- Nigeria(+234)
- Pakistan(+92)
- Saudi arabia(+966)
- Singapore(+65)
- South africa(+27)
- Sweden(+46)
- United arab emirates(+971)
The experts providing help in nursing assignments are well-versed in describing clinical reasoning, critical thinking, and clinical judgment, why critical thinking skills are essential, mapping terms that are relevant to each other; clinical reasoning, clinical judgment, and critical thinking. Thus, availing university assignment help from us ensure you to deliver a high-quality assignment for any nursing topic. However, here are some important details that differentiate critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and clinical judgment.
Critical Thinking - Not Just Being Critical
Critical thinking can be termed as your ability to concentrate over your thinking to get outcomes you require in different situation - and makes difference between your fail and success. Whether you are required to determine the ways to collaborate with doctor, setting patient’s priorities, developing care plan, and critical thinking like informed thought, and deliberate.
Developing critical thinking generally starts with having knowledge of IS. Many nurses believe that critical thinking is like “amorphous blob” which cannot be explained. This method or technique is not helpful; you should be specific with what is involved in critical thinking in different situation.
Thinking is simply a skill, just like football and tennis. It changes and flows as per the existing conditions, and needs ample knowledge, skills, hands-on practice, and experience.
This blog helps you to begin your journey in developing and enhancing thinking in two different steps, i.e.
- Understand why nursing schools and health care organizations stress the importance of critical thinking
- Determine the what exactly critical thinking is, and the ways in which it is concerned to clinical judgment and clinical reasoning
According to our assignment help experts critical thinking clearly state goals, determines assumptions, focuses on hidden values, examining and evaluating evidence, assessing conclusion, and accomplishes actions. In the term “Critical Thinking”, critical is said to be centrality or importance of thinking for an incident, situation, or issue. It doesn’t mean “negative” or “disapproval”. In the field of medicine and nursing, nurses use this skill to express their thinking that it is critical to manage a particular problem. For instance, we are collaboratively working with a team of registered nurse to develop critical thinking which is important in identifying people at risk infection. Thus, there could be several areas to be focused, such as evaluating author, writer, or speaker, evaluating argument, etc.
Critical Thinking, Clinical Reasoning, and Clinical Judgment
The terms Clinical Reasoning, Critical Thinking, and Clinical Judgment are frequently used interchangeably. Being a nursing student, you may understand the differences being used by the nurses.
- Critical thinking— it is a broad term to define. In general, it includes reasoning both inside and outside of the clinical setting. In nursing, clinical judgment and clinical reasoning are the two most important pieces of critical thinking.
- Clinical reasoning— Clinical reasoning is quite specific. It is generally referred to the methods of thinking about determining, management, and prevents patient issues. In terms of reasoning other clinical problems, nurses usually use collaboration, teamwork, and streamlining work flow.
- Clinical judgment - Clinical judgment stands for the outcome/result of clinical reasoning and/ or critical thinking. It may include the decision, conclusion, or opinion.
As per the American Nurses Association (ANA) standards, the nursing process includes diagnosis, assessment, result findings, implementation, planning, and evaluation — works as a model (critical thinking) which highlights a competent care level. Using this process cannot be easy to use in nursing and therefore we, at My Essay Mate are providing nursing assignment help to university scholars.
To make you understand the relationship between critical thinking including reasoning outside and inside of a clinical setting, we have provided a diagram based on the Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN), ANA standards, and Institute of Medicine (IOM) competencies.
The above snippet shows that the critical thinking is like an “umbrella term”. It includes various aspects concerned to reasoning outside and inside of the clinical setting. The terms Critical Thinking, Clinical Reasoning, Clinical Judgment, decision-making, problem-solving, are mostly used interchangeably. In nursing, clinical reasoning is generally referred to reasoning for patient care problems. It applies nursing processes to recognise, prevent, and control patient problems.
Our Assignment Help experts have listed few Critical Thinking Indicators (CTIs) for you. They are -
- Authentic/genuine
- Alert to context
- Logical and intuitive
- Honest and upright
- Sensitive to diversity
- Patient and persistent
- Confident and resilient
If you want to know more about Critical Thinking, Clinical Reasoning, Clinical Judgment, then Choose My Essay Mate.
Why take Assignment Help from My Essay Mate?
My Essay Mate is an oldest and trusted assignment help service provider. They have been helping scholars since 2010. Since then they are engaged in providing university assignment help to scholars who have been finding issues in their nursing assignments. If you are the one then choosing us can be the right choice. However, there could be several reasons to avail assignment help from us. Few of them are -
- Instant assignment help
- Proofreading and editing
- Download free samples
- Reasonable price
- Discount offers
- Unlimited free revisions and more.
Get your assignments done at WARP-SPEED. Get 50% OFF TOO Order Now
Leave a reply cancel reply.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Comment Please enter your comment
Name * Please enter your name
Email * Please enter your email
Post Comment
Related Blogs
March 09, 2023
What is donald schon's theory of reflective practice.
What is Rolfe's Framework For Reflective Practice?
What are the NMBA Standards for Practice Nursing?
HLTAAP002 Confirm Physical Health Status Assessment Answers
Marking Rubrics - The Path To HD Grades
How to Write an Introduction for an Assignment?
Onsite Training Courses
- Business Etiquette
- Business Writing
- Change Management
- Communication Skills
- Cross-Cultural Communication
- Customer Service
- Diversity and Inclusion
- Facilitation Skills
- Human Resources
- Leadership and Management
- Negotiation and Conflict Management
- Presentation Skills
- Productivity
- Storytelling
- Team Building
- Thinking, Planning, and Problem Solving
- Train-the-Trainer
Virtual Classroom Training Courses
- Critical Thinking, Creativity, Problem-Solving, and Decision-Making
- Management and Leadership
- Negotiation
Online Training Courses
- Business Etiquette and Professionalism
Creative and Critical Thinking
- Negotiation and Conflict Resolution
- Nonprofit Management
- Project Management
- Time Management and Productivity
Leadership Development
Corporate college solutions, interactive keynotes, meeting and retreat facilitation, one-on-one coaching.
- Custom Solutions
Ask an Expert
- Training and Development
- Workplace Communication
Media Inquiries
- Business Etiquette, Civility, and Professionalism
- Communication
- Sales and Negotiation
Assessments
- Job Needs Assessment
- Management Styles Assessment
- Kate Zabriskie
- Regina Clark
- Stefanie Coleman
- Myla DeLoatch
- Shawn Doyle
- Thomas Farley
- Elizabeth George
- Charlie Long
- Mariana Marko
- Laurie McIntosh
- Darren Murphy
- Avish Parashar
- Pamela Sumner
- Phillip Tanzilo
- Sandy Wilson
Our Clients
- Pricing and FAQs
- Fees and FAQs
- Join Our Mailing List
About Onsite Training What is onsite training?
The Full List See all onsite courses.
Locations Find out where we can deliver training.
Thinking, planning, and problem solving training courses and workshops, instructor-led programs . delivered onsite, the benefits of learning creative and critical thinking skills.
People and organizations thrive on innovative ideas, fresh perspectives, and new answers to old problems.
Critical thinking courses can help ensure teams are defining problems correctly and avoiding faulty thinking. Innovation and creativity workshops can teach people to see problems differently and craft viable solutions to workplace challenges.
If your organization could benefit from learning some new tools, one of our instructor-led training offerings may be the answer.
About Our Creativity, Critical Thinking, and Problem-Solving Programs
Our courses explore a range of planning, problem-solving, and decision-making skills. These workshops are designed to help teams develop their ability to see information through a range of lenses and methodically approach data.
The programs outline various creativity and ideation techniques, provide an overview of the process of critical thinking and its value, offer practice with problem-solving methodologies, explore innovation and decision making, and provide a forum and process for crafting a strategic plan.
Our Workshop Facilitators
The members of our team who facilitate this suite of workshops are practiced at leading groups through the tools each program offers. These workshop leaders are flexible and able to adjust the agenda as needed depending on the level of mastery the group achieves using each tool.
Our Interactive Approach to Training
We firmly believe in learning by doing, and we know the best way to master new techniques and tools is to practice them. For that reason, our workshops are activities based and hands on. During our sessions, participants can expect to solve a range of workplace problems as they practice new methods of generating ideas, defining problems, evaluating options, and making decisions.
Course Overviews
To explore our existing onsite training options, review the short descriptions found on this page. For more detailed information, click on the course titles to read the full workshop outlines.
We can conduct our workshops as described in the course overviews, tailor them to address specific issues, or fully customize content to meet your business needs.
Please get in touch , and we can schedule some time to learn more about your organization, what’s important to you, and your goals and objectives for training. We look forward to hearing from you.
Note: When evaluating the available programs, you’ll notice we offer some courses in multiple lengths. The primary difference between the shorter and longer options is the depth to which we explore the concepts and the number of exercises and activities we choose for your program.
Ah Ha! Learning to Think Critically and Creatively: Techniques for Sparking Ideas, Solving Problems, and Rethinking the Status Quo
Format: Full-Day Training Course , Multi-Day Training Course
Get Juiced!: Creative Thinking from the Inside Out
Critical Thinking
Critical considerations: three hours to better thinking.
Format: Half-Day Training Course
Design Thinking
Design thinking 101: an introduction to user-centric problem solving.
Format: Full-Day Training Course
Collaboration Skills
Collaborative thinking skills: driving teams toward better results.
Innovative Thinking: Team Creativity and Problem Solving
Decision-Making
This, that, what is it: defining problems and making decisions.
Strategic Planning
The better business workshop: strategic planning for organizational success.
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving in Customer Service
Smarter service: leveraging critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving for a better customer experience.
“Phillip was engaging and professional. I had many people who were in the session tell me that they enjoyed it.”
“The team was quite impressed with your materials and more importantly delivery style. I feel like we all took something positive away from the course which is all I can ever ask for.”
“Both sessions went great. They were informative and very interactive and Myla was able to engage the participants throughout the entire presentation. She is a wonderful instructor!”
“Phillip was a great presenter. He kept the class moving forward and kept us all engaged and participating. We all got a lot out of the training and hope to have him back again for follow up.”
“We also appreciate how well prepared you (Phillip) are, and that the subject matter is addressed in substantive way that has real impact. Your style has that special something that really engages people.”
“Business Training Works made this project extremely easy for me. Not only did they customize content for us, but they delivered it well and provided a great train-the-trainer session. It was truly an effortless experience for us!”
“Greg was awesome! Very informative and interactive. He got rave reviews from the participants.”
“It was a pleasure to work with Charlie last week. He was fantastic, and I have received great responses from the participants about the training!”
“Everyone really enjoyed it and came away with tools to help them be a stronger leader! Thank you, Greg!”
“Kate rhymes with great, and that’s what she was. This was a great class and Kate was the best. We recommend her every time. I took this class years ago with her and she makes the information stick.”
“The course has been tremendously helpful to my staff, and I am very grateful for Regina’s knowledge and generosity. She really shared her talents and experience freely, and provided what was needed to reset our team dynamics.”
“I LOVED Kate. She was an incredible speaker and her ability to educate is a show stopper. Learning about my own communication style was invaluable and I truly believe that I am going to use this information for the rest of my professional career.”
“Pamela was very engaging. The training was well presented and held the group’s attention. The feedback I got from my staff was that it was useful not only in work but in their personal lives as well.”
“I have been in several training sessions, and I have to say this has been the best one. We were all engaged in the topics. Regina’s materials were relevant to our jobs. She started on time, and the time flew by.”
“In each of the sessions that ZMC has hired Business Training Works, I have learned something new — even with the same topic. This is the 10th session we have scheduled, and we always ask for Shawn.”
“Our customer service manager of 21 years stated that this training was the best and the most relevant class she attended in her career.”
“Stefanie was upbeat, engaging, and relatable. She even kept the momentum going through an unexpected room change towards the end of our session. My colleagues cannot stop commenting how amazing the training was, and we are energized to put our new skills to work. Rave reviews all around!”
“I just wanted to send out an email to express our appreciation for the service that Greg provided. He was a very motivated and inspirational speaker. We really, and I seriously mean this, enjoyed him. We are going to adapt some of our training procedures to fit his suggestions.”
“Laurie, as always, was AMAZING!”
“I’m usually quiet in group discussions, but I enjoyed this course so much, I participated quite a bit.”
“The workshop was appreciated very much, and you (Stefanie) were indeed a big hit. Thank you for all your support and value you brought this team. I look forward to another opportunity to work with you, you were an absolute delight.”
“Pamela was a gem! We really enjoyed it. The one main piece of feedback I got was they wanted more time.”
“Pamela did a great job of engaging our participants in the training. They all had very positive feedback about the day and Pamela specifically. She was approachable and easy to relate to and was able to illustrate the points in a way that the team understood.”
“Board presentation went well. ”Excellent” according to our chairman. Thanks for your training.”
“It was a positive experience to have this training, very useful to understanding myself as a provider and patients. Laurie was engaging as a speaker. I learned to approach patient care differently seeing patients as different and not “difficult.” I took away key points and different strategies to use in my interactions with patients, just a matter of finding the time to make adjustments and implement these changes.”
“I liked that fact that we were kept busy – it never got boring.”
“The training was amazing! Everyone was enthusiastic and we learned so much. They’re already asking when you’re coming back. You are a true gem!!”
“Thomas Farley’s facilitation of the storytelling module was very engaging and effective. He started the session telling his own story. He asked participants to share their stories, and he respectfully critiqued them using this technique as a teaching tool.”
“Pamela is awesome. She has that perfect blend of knowledge, credibility, and personal skills to deliver very effective training across a wide variance of personalities.”
“I would like to say that yesterday was simply amazing. Our team is very happy with the training and the content that was presented. Thomas was exactly who we needed to address our etiquette training needs. Our team was receptive and the activities were fun and engaging. I would definitely recommend Thomas to anyone looking to enhance their team with etiquette training.”
“Myla was very professional and brought subject matter expertise to the training. My team really respected her and had nothing but positive things to say about her.”
“Pamela was amazing and extremely personable. She made the groups feel very comfortable during the training.”
“We cannot thank Stefanie enough for the fabulous presentation she delivered to our reception staff and directors of housing. We had plenty of great feedback from fellow colleagues regarding the presentation, and we’ve already had individuals implementing information they learned from the presentation. We sincerely appreciated all of Stefanie’s hard work delivering a quality presentation to a diverse group of individuals.”
“Pamela and Business Training Works put together a wonderful training program for ACERTUS. Pamela was able to create a curriculum that completely met our needs on such a short timeline. I am looking forward to working with them again!”
“I wanted to reach out to you regarding Phillip and what wonderful experience it was for our teams to have him as our facilitator for the team building and cross-cultural communication course last Friday. He’s a very talented and engaging trainer, and he was able to get even our toughest employees to participate. Everyone really liked Phillip and enjoyed the course.”
“I wasn’t sure what to expect and found it to be awesome. I am in business development and while I consider myself to be somewhat refined/savvy, I walked away with so many things to up my game while with clients and the number one lesson and tie back point is that it is 100% about making the client feel comfortable and special. What we do, how we act, how we present ourselves all feeds into that and our ultimate success as sales professionals.”
“We had an amazing day today! Everyone I spoke to during the day today said they were really enjoying the session (as did I). Charlie did a fantastic job. Thank you both for a great experience!”
“Great performance by Shawn! Shawn Doyle is a great presenter, and teaches you just by presenting himself.”
“Yesterday’s workshop was both thoroughly enjoyable and tremendously beneficial. From all accounts, it was a productive, engaging, and substantive experience from which participants were able to glean significant professional insights and lessons for best practices in their field.”
“Thank you for yet another great presentation. Myla was wonderful and our team really appreciated the opportunity to work with her.”
“Thank you again for working with us last week. As always, the team loved the session, and I’ve been hearing great feedback. The change in the leadership team’s behavior, even since just last week, is noticeable. The executive team and I have literally had people coming up to us all week talking about how excited they are for the future, how they believe in where we are headed, and thanking us for what’s being done. As a business leader, this time period is truly a career highlight for me. I can’t thank you enough.”
“A pleasure doing business with Business Training Works on our seminar.”
“Phillip, you are the best! Loved every minute and the fun interactive aspect of our workshop exceeded my expectation. Looking forward to the LA workshop next month.”
“As I sit here listening to Laurie, I am thinking that we couldn’t have asked for a better facilitator!!! Wanted to say a quick thank you for your exceptional “customer service” in dealing with us.”
“Kate was a refreshing start to 2020! Very energetic and captivating the entire session. Moments of reflection, laughter, and engagement made this a great FLAG kickoff to the year!”
“Greg Jones was a DYNAMITE presenter! He was fun, knowledgeable, and engaging and had our large group of 50+ people laughing and participating right up until the 5:00 PM end time. I am always impressed when a facilitator can keep a group engaged and involved WITHOUT using PPT and Greg did just that with his handouts, flip charting, storytelling and mixing up activities at table groups, teams, and with partners. We would love to have him back!”
“Laurie McIntosh brings her personal experience into the training which was invaluable.”
“The course was high-quality, first-class, first-rate, superior, fine, excellent and hence forth. Charles’ way of teaching was pleasant, exceptional, superb, and commendable. My department will speak well about this course for a while. Thank you so much for the quality of training and attention to detail. We are excited to use the tools created by zombies. However, in all seriousness the course was facio delicias and nuntiisque (fun and informative in Latin). I look forward to using your company in the future.”
“I heard a lot of positive feedback and several people approached me about your contact info for following up. I know we had a short amount of time for the training but I know I found it valuable and I think the rest of the group did too.”
“Eduardo was an excellent facilitator. I took so much with me to apply to my job responsibilities that will enhance my thinking as I resolve difficult callers and issues. Eduardo was very interactive with the group and had excellent ideas to promote thinking and participation. He is the greatest facilitator I have ever worked with!”
“Pamela Sumner is professional, warm, and highly educated. Her style translates to small groups as well as large formal settings. She is definitely an asset to BTW.”
“Stefanie is knowledgeable, credible, fun and engaging as a facilitator.”
“WOW – where do I begin!? Working with you both has been an outstanding experience throughout the entire process. Your flexibility from first contact was very valuable – we appreciate your willingness to participate in multiple teleconferences to align with KMG.
Your ability to link KMG’s message and philosophies to the lessons is what set you apart from your competitors.
Kate’s energy and willingness to meet as many of the attendees as possible and her ability to quickly build a rapport with folks established credibility and a safe environment. Everyone valued the ‘informalness’ of the key note.
The Tuesday workshop was phenomenal! I saw people taking notes that I never would have imagined would be engaged.
Fantastic result overall – thank you so very much!”
“Shawn was an excellent facilitator. After our class he took the time to look over the questions we use during our interview and provided positive feedback. I highly recommend Shawn and this course, ‘How to Interview and Hire Well’.”
“We did enjoy the class and yes, I am excited to work with you to bring in more. Charles is a great teacher, I would like to have him teach them.”
“Thank you Kate, Chris, and Kathy! It was a pleasure working with you, and thank you for providing some valuable insights for our SES!”
The Business Training Works Difference
When you team with us, you’ll get:
- A partner who will ask questions about your goals and objectives.
- An opportunity to have a tailoring call and to speak with the program facilitator prior to a workshop.
- Interactive facilitation conducted by someone who has a deep understanding of adult learning and the topic at hand.
- A post-training web-based skills check-in meeting if desired.
- People behind the scenes who will work to make our relationship a success.
You won’t get:
- A workshop leader who sells products during class time.
- A talking head with a PowerPoint presentation and not much else.
- Lecture-based training that’s too academic, not practical, and doesn’t connect to life in the workplace.
- The sense that you are a number, a transaction, or a cog in a machine.
Onsite Training Course Reminders
Our instructor-led training courses are available to private groups. These workshops are not offered in a public seminar format. Please contact us to speak with a facilitator about your needs and bringing training to your organization.
We also travel to Africa, Australia and New Zealand, Asia, Canada, Central America, Continental Europe, the Middle East, and the United Kingdom.
Please contact us about your location.
- For information about pricing, please see our fee schedule .
- For instructor-led webinars, take a look at our virtual classroom programs .
- For information about self-paced courses available to anyone, visit our online courses catalog .
- For free resources, check out our resources pages .
ONSITE CREATIVITY, CRITICAL THINKING, INNOVATION, AND DECISION-MAKING TRAINING CATALOG COURSES . CLASSES . WORKSHOPS . SEMINARS . PROGRAMS
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving
The ability to identify and respond to needs based upon an understanding of situational context and logical analysis of relevant information. Exercising sound reasoning to analyze issues, make decisions, and overcome problems. Being able to obtain, interpret, and use knowledge, facts, and data in this process, and demonstrate originality and inventiveness as needed.
Sample Behaviors
- Make decisions and solve problems using sound, inclusive reasoning and judgment.
- Gather and analyze information from a diverse set of sources and individuals to fully understand a problem.
- Proactively anticipate needs and prioritize action steps.
- Accurately summarize and interpret data with an awareness of personal biases that may impact outcomes.
- Effectively communicate actions and rationale, recognizing the diverse perspectives and lived experiences of stakeholders.
- Multi-task well in a fast-paced environment.
Developing Critical Thinking and Problem Solving
- Participate in Case Competitions
- Conduct research projects
- Serve as a leader in a student organization
- Plan an event
- Take a course in a new field
- Evaluate resources, your own thinking, and multiple points of view
- Ask Questions, and listen
- Take time to reflect on what you are learning and doing
What does growth look like?
Catherine Coe Director of Gator Ready Email Catherine
If you would like to request a Gator Ready demo or have questions about using Gator Ready please email a Gator Ready Ambassador .
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Here are some differences between the two skills: Critical thinking This is a mode of thinking, compared to problem-solving, which is a set of solution-oriented strategies. Since critical thinking strengthens your reasoning, it makes it easier to learn new skills, including problem-solving.
The first step to enhancing your critical thinking and problem solving skills is to think about them, become aware of them, then you can actively practice to improve them. Critical thinking and problem-solving are two important "soft" or essential skills hiring managers are looking for.
Problem solving uses many of the same skills required for critical thinking; e.g., observation, analysis, evaluation, interpretation, and reflection. Critical thinking is an important ingredient of problem solving. Critical thinking vs. problem solving: Not all problems require critical thinking skills
Problem Solving and Critical Thinking Everyone experiences problems from time to time. Some of our problems are big and complicated, while others may be more easily solved. There is no shortage of challenges and issues that can arise on the job. ... Discuss the difference between praise, criticism, and feedback and ask participants for examples ...
Critical thinking is analyzing and exploring with confirming and disconfirming information in mind. Problem solving is endeavoring to find a solution in a practical manner, not necessarily the most optimal solution. Greg Seller Former Labor, some sales, but mostly IT pgm/sys developer Author has 12.3K answers and 942.7K answer views 4 y
Critical thinking, analytical reasoning, and problem-solving skills are required to perform well on tasks expected by employers. 1 Having good problem-solving and critical thinking skills can make a major difference in a person's career. 2 Problem Solving
Watch on Definition Simply put, critical thinking is the act of deliberately analyzing information so that you can make better judgements and decisions. It involves using things like logic, reasoning, and creativity, to draw conclusions and generally understand things better.
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving: 21st Century Skills Ashley Delaney • 16.7k views Opportunities for AI in u000bIntelligent Web-based Technology-Supported Learning Carsten Ullrich • 2.8k views How to solve problems (or at least try) with 8D Stefan Kovacs • 41.8k views Logic: Critical Thinking and Correct Reasoning Sam Bernales Jr •
Generally speaking, critical thinking is a broad category of deeper-level thinking skills used to complete specific tasks. This includes things like analyzing situations, solving problems, comparing and contrasting, and drawing conclusions based on a given set of data.
Unlike in the case of Creative thinking, Critical thinking adopts a much more rigid position. One of the features of Critical thinking is that it is not so expansive like creative thinking. In fact, it can be said that critical thinking is judgmental in nature. It is interesting to note that critical thinking is selective too.
Both critical thinking and creative thinking are used for solving problems, only in different ways. For critical thinking, the process is structured and methodical. For creative thinking, the process is fluid and somewhat experimental.
Understanding critical thinking and problem solving. Being able to think critically and problem solve is very important. These are transferable skills. which mean they are useful in many different ...
Changeboard team. Published. 30 Jul 2019. The key difference between problem solving and decision making is that solving problems is a process, whereas making decisions is an action based on insights derived during the problem-solving process. Many people use the terms problem solving and decision making interchangeably, but they are not the same.
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving toward Decision-Making. During the training the main critical thinking and problem solving techniques are introduced together with real-life examples. The difference between problem solving and decision making is examined and clarified.
Students with disabilities are often framed as "the problem" and have limited opportunities to engage in standards based mathematics, leading to persistent underachievement. In this paper, we investigate a research divide between mathematics educational research for students with and without disabilities, a divide with significant differences in the theoretical orientations and research ...
The process of developing creative ideas to solve problems is called problem solving. Problem solving often requires more than just creativity; it also requires critical thinking. Critical thinkers evaluate solutions to problems, in order to make decisions that are most likely to succeed.
Critical Thinking vs. Creative Thinking - Key Differences Creative thinking tries to create something new, while critical thinking seeks to assess worth or validity of something that already exists. Creative thinking is generative, while critical thinking is analytical. Creative thinking is divergent, while critical thinking is convergent.
Critical thinking is the ability to clearly and logically consider information that is presented to us. Creative thinking is about generating new, novel, or useful ideas. The great innovators...
Summary. Convergent thinking focuses on finding one well-defined solution to a problem. Divergent thinking is the opposite of convergent thinking and involves more creativity. In this piece, we'll explain the differences between convergent and divergent thinking in the problem-solving process. We'll also discuss the importance of using both ...
Decision making is often thought to be synonymous with management and is one of the criteria on which management expertise is judged. Much of any manager's time is spent critically examining issues, solving problems, and making decisions.
Basically, analytical thinking seeks to review and breakdown the information gathered while critical thinking looks to make a holistic judgment using various sources of information including a person's own existing knowledge. Analytical thinking is more linear and step-by-step breakdown of information. On the other hand, critical thinking is ...
This study aims to examine the effect of the P4C curriculum on 5-6-year-old children's critical thinking through philosophical inquiry and their problem-solving skills. The study group included a total of 40 children learning in kindergartens at an elementary school in Çanakkale, Turkey. The study used a quasi-experimental model with the pretest-posttest control group.
The terms Critical Thinking, Clinical Reasoning, Clinical Judgment, decision-making, problem-solving, are mostly used interchangeably. In nursing, clinical reasoning is generally referred to reasoning for patient care problems. It applies nursing processes to recognise, prevent, and control patient problems.
This interactive critical-thinking course explores creative and critical thinking and exposes participants to multiple ideation techniques. By the conclusion of this workshop, participants should be able to isolate problems, recognize the difference between left and right-brain thinking, demonstrate the Osborn-Parnes principle, apply a variety ...
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving. The ability to identify and respond to needs based upon an understanding of situational context and logical analysis of relevant information. Exercising sound reasoning to analyze issues, make decisions, and overcome problems. Being able to obtain, interpret, and use knowledge, facts, and data in this ...
In practice, problem-solving tends to focus on the identification and resolution of a problem, whilst critical thinking goes beyond this to incorporate asking skilled questions and critiquing solutions. Critical thinking has been defined in many ways, but is essentially the process of deliberate, systematic and logical thinking, while ...